Fairness conceptions and self-determined mitigation ambition under the Paris Agreement: Is there a relationship?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This paper investigates the empirical relationship between countries’ expressed concerns with fairness and the ambition levels in their pledged contributions (NDCs) to the Paris Agreement, asking the following questions: 1) Are the NDCs of countries who express the most concern with fairness more or less ambitious than those of other countries? 2) Does the relationship between fairness and ambition vary across the three fairness principles: Responsibility, Capability, and Rights (needs)? and 3) Is there a tendency for countries to support the fairness principle that implies the largest emissions share for themselves if that principle were used to allocate emissions across countries? The analysis reveals considerable variation in both fairness concerns and assessed NDC ambitions, but no clear relationship between the two. Countries’ expressed support for fairness principles does not correlate with the ambition levels of their NDCs, whether principles are aggregated or disaggregated. The analysis also finds no evidence that countries strategically advocate the fairness principle that allocates them the largest “fair” emissions share.

Details

Authors
Organisations
External organisations
  • University of Oslo
  • European University Institute San Domenico
  • Carleton University
  • IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute
  • CICERO Center for International Climate Research
Research areas and keywords

Subject classification (UKÄ) – MANDATORY

  • Environmental Sciences
  • Political Science (excluding Public Administration Studies and Globalization Studies)

Keywords

  • Ambition, Climate negotiations, Equity, Fairness, Paris Agreement, UNFCCC
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)245-254
Number of pages10
JournalEnvironmental Science and Policy
Volume101
Publication statusPublished - 2019
Publication categoryResearch
Peer-reviewedYes