Fairness conceptions and self-determined mitigation ambition under the Paris Agreement: Is there a relationship?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Standard

Fairness conceptions and self-determined mitigation ambition under the Paris Agreement : Is there a relationship? / Sælen, Håkon; Tørstad, Vegard; Holz, Christian; Nielsen, Tobias Dan.

In: Environmental Science and Policy, Vol. 101, 2019, p. 245-254.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Harvard

APA

CBE

MLA

Vancouver

Author

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Fairness conceptions and self-determined mitigation ambition under the Paris Agreement

T2 - Is there a relationship?

AU - Sælen, Håkon

AU - Tørstad, Vegard

AU - Holz, Christian

AU - Nielsen, Tobias Dan

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - This paper investigates the empirical relationship between countries’ expressed concerns with fairness and the ambition levels in their pledged contributions (NDCs) to the Paris Agreement, asking the following questions: 1) Are the NDCs of countries who express the most concern with fairness more or less ambitious than those of other countries? 2) Does the relationship between fairness and ambition vary across the three fairness principles: Responsibility, Capability, and Rights (needs)? and 3) Is there a tendency for countries to support the fairness principle that implies the largest emissions share for themselves if that principle were used to allocate emissions across countries? The analysis reveals considerable variation in both fairness concerns and assessed NDC ambitions, but no clear relationship between the two. Countries’ expressed support for fairness principles does not correlate with the ambition levels of their NDCs, whether principles are aggregated or disaggregated. The analysis also finds no evidence that countries strategically advocate the fairness principle that allocates them the largest “fair” emissions share.

AB - This paper investigates the empirical relationship between countries’ expressed concerns with fairness and the ambition levels in their pledged contributions (NDCs) to the Paris Agreement, asking the following questions: 1) Are the NDCs of countries who express the most concern with fairness more or less ambitious than those of other countries? 2) Does the relationship between fairness and ambition vary across the three fairness principles: Responsibility, Capability, and Rights (needs)? and 3) Is there a tendency for countries to support the fairness principle that implies the largest emissions share for themselves if that principle were used to allocate emissions across countries? The analysis reveals considerable variation in both fairness concerns and assessed NDC ambitions, but no clear relationship between the two. Countries’ expressed support for fairness principles does not correlate with the ambition levels of their NDCs, whether principles are aggregated or disaggregated. The analysis also finds no evidence that countries strategically advocate the fairness principle that allocates them the largest “fair” emissions share.

KW - Ambition

KW - Climate negotiations

KW - Equity

KW - Fairness

KW - Paris Agreement

KW - UNFCCC

U2 - 10.1016/j.envsci.2019.08.018

DO - 10.1016/j.envsci.2019.08.018

M3 - Article

VL - 101

SP - 245

EP - 254

JO - Environmental Science and Policy

JF - Environmental Science and Policy

SN - 1462-9011

ER -