Filosofihistoria och sekularisering. Om filosofins teologiska genealogi

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingBook chapter

Abstract

Writing the history of philosophy to some extent also implies expressing a certain philosophy of history. This article discusses a particular case of this dialectic, namely how one has related modern philosophy to pre-modern theological philosophies when writing the history of philosophy during the 20th Century. Is the emphasis put on the continuity or the interruptions between the two traditions, and what are the philosophical motives and presuppositions behind either view? The article’s focus is on the so called Löwith-Blumenberg debate – where Karl Löwith has defended a continuity between theology and philosophy in his famous ”thesis of secularization”, whereas Hans Blumenberg has argued for a radical autonomy of the modern philosophical and scientific project. In my conclusion I take the stand of Löwith and argue that a too strong accent on the interruption between the Jewish- Christian theological heritage and the modern project tends to nurture the modern ideal of philosophical presuppositionlessness.

Details

Authors
External organisations
  • Stockholm school of theology
Research areas and keywords

Subject classification (UKÄ) – MANDATORY

  • Philosophy, Ethics and Religion

Keywords

  • historiefilosofi, sekularisering, progression, Löwith, Blumenberg
Original languageSwedish
Title of host publicationLychnos. Årsbok för idé- och lärdomshistoria. Tema: Filosofihistoriens idé
EditorsMats Persson, Sharon Rider
Pages269-282
Publication statusPublished - 2006
Publication categoryResearch
Peer-reviewedYes
Externally publishedYes

Publication series

Name
ISSN (Print)0076-1648

Total downloads

No data available

Related research output

Jayne Svenungsson, 2006, In : L’Orient des dieux. VI–VII, p. 65-82

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

View all (1)