Good urodynamic practices: uroflowmetry, filling cystometry, and pressure-flow studies

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article

Standard

Good urodynamic practices: uroflowmetry, filling cystometry, and pressure-flow studies. / Schafer, Werner; Abrams, Paul; Liao, Limin; Mattiasson, Anders; Pesce, Francesco; Spangberg, Anders; Sterling, Arthur M; Zinner, Norman R; van Kerrebroeck, Philip.

In: Neurourology and Urodynamics, Vol. 21, No. 3, 2002, p. 261-274.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article

Harvard

Schafer, W, Abrams, P, Liao, L, Mattiasson, A, Pesce, F, Spangberg, A, Sterling, AM, Zinner, NR & van Kerrebroeck, P 2002, 'Good urodynamic practices: uroflowmetry, filling cystometry, and pressure-flow studies', Neurourology and Urodynamics, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 261-274. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.10066

APA

Schafer, W., Abrams, P., Liao, L., Mattiasson, A., Pesce, F., Spangberg, A., Sterling, A. M., Zinner, N. R., & van Kerrebroeck, P. (2002). Good urodynamic practices: uroflowmetry, filling cystometry, and pressure-flow studies. Neurourology and Urodynamics, 21(3), 261-274. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.10066

CBE

Schafer W, Abrams P, Liao L, Mattiasson A, Pesce F, Spangberg A, Sterling AM, Zinner NR, van Kerrebroeck P. 2002. Good urodynamic practices: uroflowmetry, filling cystometry, and pressure-flow studies. Neurourology and Urodynamics. 21(3):261-274. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.10066

MLA

Schafer, Werner et al. "Good urodynamic practices: uroflowmetry, filling cystometry, and pressure-flow studies". Neurourology and Urodynamics. 2002, 21(3). 261-274. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.10066

Vancouver

Schafer W, Abrams P, Liao L, Mattiasson A, Pesce F, Spangberg A et al. Good urodynamic practices: uroflowmetry, filling cystometry, and pressure-flow studies. Neurourology and Urodynamics. 2002;21(3):261-274. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.10066

Author

Schafer, Werner ; Abrams, Paul ; Liao, Limin ; Mattiasson, Anders ; Pesce, Francesco ; Spangberg, Anders ; Sterling, Arthur M ; Zinner, Norman R ; van Kerrebroeck, Philip. / Good urodynamic practices: uroflowmetry, filling cystometry, and pressure-flow studies. In: Neurourology and Urodynamics. 2002 ; Vol. 21, No. 3. pp. 261-274.

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Good urodynamic practices: uroflowmetry, filling cystometry, and pressure-flow studies

AU - Schafer, Werner

AU - Abrams, Paul

AU - Liao, Limin

AU - Mattiasson, Anders

AU - Pesce, Francesco

AU - Spangberg, Anders

AU - Sterling, Arthur M

AU - Zinner, Norman R

AU - van Kerrebroeck, Philip

PY - 2002

Y1 - 2002

N2 - This is the first report of the International Continence Society (ICS) on the development of comprehensive guidelines for Good Urodynamic Practice for the measurement, quality control, and documentation of urodynamic investigations in both clinical and research environments. This report focuses on the most common urodynamics examinations; uroflowmetry, pressure recording during filling cystometry, and combined pressure-flow studies. The basic aspects of good urodynamic practice are discussed and a strategy for urodynamic measurement, equipment set-up and configuration, signal testing, plausibility controls, pattern recognition, and artifact correction are proposed. The problems of data analysis are mentioned only when they are relevant in the judgment of data quality. In general, recommendations are made for one specific technique. This does not imply that this technique is the only one possible. Rather, it means that this technique is well-established, and gives good results when used with the suggested standards of good urodynamic practice.

AB - This is the first report of the International Continence Society (ICS) on the development of comprehensive guidelines for Good Urodynamic Practice for the measurement, quality control, and documentation of urodynamic investigations in both clinical and research environments. This report focuses on the most common urodynamics examinations; uroflowmetry, pressure recording during filling cystometry, and combined pressure-flow studies. The basic aspects of good urodynamic practice are discussed and a strategy for urodynamic measurement, equipment set-up and configuration, signal testing, plausibility controls, pattern recognition, and artifact correction are proposed. The problems of data analysis are mentioned only when they are relevant in the judgment of data quality. In general, recommendations are made for one specific technique. This does not imply that this technique is the only one possible. Rather, it means that this technique is well-established, and gives good results when used with the suggested standards of good urodynamic practice.

U2 - 10.1002/nau.10066

DO - 10.1002/nau.10066

M3 - Article

VL - 21

SP - 261

EP - 274

JO - Neurourology and Urodynamics

JF - Neurourology and Urodynamics

SN - 0733-2467

IS - 3

ER -