Holistic approach in engineering design - controlling risks from accidental hazards in bridge design

Research output: ThesisDoctoral Thesis (compilation)

Standard

Holistic approach in engineering design - controlling risks from accidental hazards in bridge design. / Björnsson, Ivar.

Lund University (Media-Tryck), 2015. 258 p.

Research output: ThesisDoctoral Thesis (compilation)

Harvard

APA

CBE

MLA

Vancouver

Author

RIS

TY - THES

T1 - Holistic approach in engineering design - controlling risks from accidental hazards in bridge design

AU - Björnsson, Ivar

N1 - Defence details Date: 2015-11-06 Time: 10:15 Place: Lecture hall MA1, Mathematics Annex building, Sölvegatan 20, Lund University, Faculty of Engineering, LTH External reviewer(s) Name: Faber, Michael Title: Professor Affiliation: Technical University of Denmark, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark ---

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Engineering design, in concise terms, is what engineers do using what they know. It is the underlying decision making activity that determines what is to be built and how it should be built. An ever present requirement in engineering design is that the structure should be safe. While historical approaches to safety in design relied on experience and engineering judgment, modern approaches have rationalized uncertainty in an effort to treat risks in a more consistent and objective way. Concurrent to these advancements, design codes have been developed which include safety formats that are calibrated using these rationalized approaches. This thesis investigates the limitations of the design codes in controlling risks in engineering design and proposes that a complementary approach – involving case-specific risk assessments – is necessary for addressing the risks that are not properly treated by the design codes. The main advantage of such an approach is that: • it broadens the scope of assessment to consider structural systems and possibly non-structural constituents; • it is also applicable during the conceptual design phase for the bridge structure; and • it is complementary to current codified approaches While similar approaches are common in large scale construction projects they are rarely applied in the design of more conventional bridge structures. However, in this thesis it is argued that the application of such approaches is also useful in more common bridge projects to better control risks inadequately treated by design based on code compliance. A framework for a holistic risk-informed approach is provided which focuses on the conceptual design of bridge structures and on the control of risks from accidental hazards. Case studies are conducted to highlight the usefulness of the approach and to help develop crucial aspects of the approach while providing useful background information for its possible implementation in future projects. Specific attention is also paid to the modeling of risks from heavy goods vehicle (HGV) impacts to bridge substructures – a design situation which was found to be inadequate treated using current codified approaches.

AB - Engineering design, in concise terms, is what engineers do using what they know. It is the underlying decision making activity that determines what is to be built and how it should be built. An ever present requirement in engineering design is that the structure should be safe. While historical approaches to safety in design relied on experience and engineering judgment, modern approaches have rationalized uncertainty in an effort to treat risks in a more consistent and objective way. Concurrent to these advancements, design codes have been developed which include safety formats that are calibrated using these rationalized approaches. This thesis investigates the limitations of the design codes in controlling risks in engineering design and proposes that a complementary approach – involving case-specific risk assessments – is necessary for addressing the risks that are not properly treated by the design codes. The main advantage of such an approach is that: • it broadens the scope of assessment to consider structural systems and possibly non-structural constituents; • it is also applicable during the conceptual design phase for the bridge structure; and • it is complementary to current codified approaches While similar approaches are common in large scale construction projects they are rarely applied in the design of more conventional bridge structures. However, in this thesis it is argued that the application of such approaches is also useful in more common bridge projects to better control risks inadequately treated by design based on code compliance. A framework for a holistic risk-informed approach is provided which focuses on the conceptual design of bridge structures and on the control of risks from accidental hazards. Case studies are conducted to highlight the usefulness of the approach and to help develop crucial aspects of the approach while providing useful background information for its possible implementation in future projects. Specific attention is also paid to the modeling of risks from heavy goods vehicle (HGV) impacts to bridge substructures – a design situation which was found to be inadequate treated using current codified approaches.

KW - design

KW - codes

KW - accidental

KW - extreme

KW - bridges

KW - holistic

KW - approach

KW - robustness

KW - risk

KW - reliability

KW - uncertainty

M3 - Doctoral Thesis (compilation)

SN - 978-91-87993-03-9

T3 - TVBK

PB - Lund University (Media-Tryck)

ER -