Islamizing the present, challenging the past

Research output: Contribution to conferenceAbstract

Standard

Islamizing the present, challenging the past. / Janson, Torsten.

2018. Abstract from World Congress for Middle Eastern Studies 2018, Seville, Spain.

Research output: Contribution to conferenceAbstract

Harvard

Janson, T 2018, 'Islamizing the present, challenging the past' World Congress for Middle Eastern Studies 2018, Seville, Spain, 2018/07/16 - 2018/07/22, .

APA

Janson, T. (2018). Islamizing the present, challenging the past. Abstract from World Congress for Middle Eastern Studies 2018, Seville, Spain.

CBE

Janson T. 2018. Islamizing the present, challenging the past. Abstract from World Congress for Middle Eastern Studies 2018, Seville, Spain.

MLA

Vancouver

Janson T. Islamizing the present, challenging the past. 2018. Abstract from World Congress for Middle Eastern Studies 2018, Seville, Spain.

Author

Janson, Torsten. / Islamizing the present, challenging the past. Abstract from World Congress for Middle Eastern Studies 2018, Seville, Spain.

RIS

TY - CONF

T1 - Islamizing the present, challenging the past

AU - Janson, Torsten

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - The trajectories of politically activist and socially committed interpretations of Islam in (late)modern societies continue to spur heated debate and academic discussion. A recurrent theme is the compatibility of Islamic ideological/legal foundations vis-à-vis secular state institutions and liberal democracy. Other debates concern rights and identity politics, problematizing the recognition of religious versus human/civil rights, often in connection to gender discussions. And perhaps most vocal today are the debates of (notions of) Islam and Muslim agendas in relation to multiculturalism, integration and security. All too often, the debates build on simplified dichotomies, such as religious/secular, theocratic/democratic, violent/peaceful, and oppressive/liberating. Looking beyond such dichotomies, this panel proposes to explore how socially committed interpretations of Islam often ambiguously develops within, and prospers from, the secular state institutions, the local socio-cultural processes and the national-historical narratives they rhetorically set out to challenge. In recent history as well as the present, Islamic movements and Muslim actors have formulated agendas in open-ended, hybridized yet subversive accommodations. In short, prevalent socio-political order may simultaneously constrain and facilitate the appeal to Islamic signage and moral universes. Such perspectives build on an anthropological understanding of the political significance of Islamic symbols in Middle Eastern and diasporic societies. Politics indeed entails a symbolically expressed, public negotiation process of common social values, to draw on Eickelman & Piscatori. Accordingly, as pointed out by Lisa Wedeen, the management and manipulation of systems of signification are essential elements in the maintenance of political order, as well as in the subversion thereof. In line with such dynamic perspectives on the political-cum-religious processes in current Middle Eastern and diasporic societies, this panel presents four divergent but interconnected perspectives on how (allegedly) Islamically inspired actors appeal to politically significant religious symbolic systems in their aspirations to agency, influence and authenticity. The papers of the panel will explore how they do so through subversive, creative and innovative appropriations of state institutions, historical narratives and political discourses.

AB - The trajectories of politically activist and socially committed interpretations of Islam in (late)modern societies continue to spur heated debate and academic discussion. A recurrent theme is the compatibility of Islamic ideological/legal foundations vis-à-vis secular state institutions and liberal democracy. Other debates concern rights and identity politics, problematizing the recognition of religious versus human/civil rights, often in connection to gender discussions. And perhaps most vocal today are the debates of (notions of) Islam and Muslim agendas in relation to multiculturalism, integration and security. All too often, the debates build on simplified dichotomies, such as religious/secular, theocratic/democratic, violent/peaceful, and oppressive/liberating. Looking beyond such dichotomies, this panel proposes to explore how socially committed interpretations of Islam often ambiguously develops within, and prospers from, the secular state institutions, the local socio-cultural processes and the national-historical narratives they rhetorically set out to challenge. In recent history as well as the present, Islamic movements and Muslim actors have formulated agendas in open-ended, hybridized yet subversive accommodations. In short, prevalent socio-political order may simultaneously constrain and facilitate the appeal to Islamic signage and moral universes. Such perspectives build on an anthropological understanding of the political significance of Islamic symbols in Middle Eastern and diasporic societies. Politics indeed entails a symbolically expressed, public negotiation process of common social values, to draw on Eickelman & Piscatori. Accordingly, as pointed out by Lisa Wedeen, the management and manipulation of systems of signification are essential elements in the maintenance of political order, as well as in the subversion thereof. In line with such dynamic perspectives on the political-cum-religious processes in current Middle Eastern and diasporic societies, this panel presents four divergent but interconnected perspectives on how (allegedly) Islamically inspired actors appeal to politically significant religious symbolic systems in their aspirations to agency, influence and authenticity. The papers of the panel will explore how they do so through subversive, creative and innovative appropriations of state institutions, historical narratives and political discourses.

M3 - Abstract

ER -