Land Sparing Versus Land Sharing: Moving Forward

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Standard

Land Sparing Versus Land Sharing: Moving Forward. / Fischer, Joern; Abson, David J.; Butsic, Van; Chappell, M. Jahi; Ekroos, Johan; Hanspach, Jan; Kuemmerle, Tobias; Smith, Henrik; von Wehrden, Henrik.

In: Conservation Letters, Vol. 7, No. 3, 2014, p. 149-157.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Harvard

Fischer, J, Abson, DJ, Butsic, V, Chappell, MJ, Ekroos, J, Hanspach, J, Kuemmerle, T, Smith, H & von Wehrden, H 2014, 'Land Sparing Versus Land Sharing: Moving Forward', Conservation Letters, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 149-157. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12084

APA

Fischer, J., Abson, D. J., Butsic, V., Chappell, M. J., Ekroos, J., Hanspach, J., ... von Wehrden, H. (2014). Land Sparing Versus Land Sharing: Moving Forward. Conservation Letters, 7(3), 149-157. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12084

CBE

Fischer J, Abson DJ, Butsic V, Chappell MJ, Ekroos J, Hanspach J, Kuemmerle T, Smith H, von Wehrden H. 2014. Land Sparing Versus Land Sharing: Moving Forward. Conservation Letters. 7(3):149-157. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12084

MLA

Vancouver

Fischer J, Abson DJ, Butsic V, Chappell MJ, Ekroos J, Hanspach J et al. Land Sparing Versus Land Sharing: Moving Forward. Conservation Letters. 2014;7(3):149-157. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12084

Author

Fischer, Joern ; Abson, David J. ; Butsic, Van ; Chappell, M. Jahi ; Ekroos, Johan ; Hanspach, Jan ; Kuemmerle, Tobias ; Smith, Henrik ; von Wehrden, Henrik. / Land Sparing Versus Land Sharing: Moving Forward. In: Conservation Letters. 2014 ; Vol. 7, No. 3. pp. 149-157.

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Land Sparing Versus Land Sharing: Moving Forward

AU - Fischer, Joern

AU - Abson, David J.

AU - Butsic, Van

AU - Chappell, M. Jahi

AU - Ekroos, Johan

AU - Hanspach, Jan

AU - Kuemmerle, Tobias

AU - Smith, Henrik

AU - von Wehrden, Henrik

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - To address the challenges of biodiversity conservation and commodity production, a framework has been proposed that distinguishes between the integration (land sharing) and separation (land sparing) of conservation and production. Controversy has arisen around this framework partly because many scholars have focused specifically on food production rather than more encompassing notions such as land scarcity or food security. Controversy further surrounds the practical value of partial trade-off analyses, the ways in which biodiversity should be quantified, and a series of scale effects that are not readily accounted for. We see key priorities for the future in (1) addressing these issues when using the existing framework, and (2) developing alternative, holistic ways to conceptualise challenges related to food, biodiversity, and land scarcity.

AB - To address the challenges of biodiversity conservation and commodity production, a framework has been proposed that distinguishes between the integration (land sharing) and separation (land sparing) of conservation and production. Controversy has arisen around this framework partly because many scholars have focused specifically on food production rather than more encompassing notions such as land scarcity or food security. Controversy further surrounds the practical value of partial trade-off analyses, the ways in which biodiversity should be quantified, and a series of scale effects that are not readily accounted for. We see key priorities for the future in (1) addressing these issues when using the existing framework, and (2) developing alternative, holistic ways to conceptualise challenges related to food, biodiversity, and land scarcity.

KW - Agroecological intensification

KW - agroecology

KW - food security

KW - food

KW - sovereignty

KW - land scarcity

KW - matrix

KW - sustainable intensification

KW - wildlife-friendly farming

U2 - 10.1111/conl.12084

DO - 10.1111/conl.12084

M3 - Review article

VL - 7

SP - 149

EP - 157

JO - Conservation Letters

JF - Conservation Letters

SN - 1755-263X

IS - 3

ER -