Limitations of Transitional Justice in the PRC: the Curious Absence of the inoffizielle Mitarbeiter

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper, not in proceeding

Abstract

My paper begins with some brief observations on the existing literature on the Chinese Communist Party’s post-Mao reversal of so-called unjust, wrong, and false cases. The paper then proceeds to examine a noteworthy difference between the PRC case and transitional justice in other states where “the transitional” entailed a further shift in power from an ancien regime to an entirely new order (viz. Eastern Europe after 1989): the complete absence from the Chinese public record of the inoffizielle Mitarbeiter (teqing in Chinese). Drawing on Chinese Public Security files, I argue that his/her absence from accounts of injustices and justice should not be interpreted as evidence of the teqing not actually having been present in Mao Zedong’s socio-political reality. Public Security organs had, in many of the categories of cases reviewed in the post-Mao transitional justice system, regulalry and routinely employed the operational instrument of the teqing to obtain (fabricate?) evidence and secure (false?) convictions.

Details

Authors
Organisations
Research areas and keywords

Subject classification (UKÄ) – MANDATORY

  • History and Archaeology

Keywords

  • China, law, justice, Cultural Revolution, informers, inoffizielle Mitarbeiter
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages15
Publication statusUnpublished - 2013
Publication categoryResearch
Peer-reviewedNo
EventJustice and Accountability in Maoist China and After - München, Germany
Duration: 2013 Mar 8 → …

Conference

ConferenceJustice and Accountability in Maoist China and After
CountryGermany
CityMünchen
Period2013/03/08 → …

Total downloads

No data available