Modelling Spatial Compositional Data: Reconstructions of past land cover and uncertainties

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In this paper we construct a hierarchical model for spatial compositional data which is used to reconstruct past land-cover compositions (in terms of coniferous forest, broadleaved forest, and unforested/open land) for five time periods during the past 6000 years over Europe. The model consists of a Gaussian Markov Random Field (GMRF) with Dirichlet observations. A block updated Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC), including an adaptive Metropolis adjusted Langevin step, is used to estimate model parameters. The sparse precision matrix in the GMRF provides computational advantages leading to a fast MCMC algorithm. Reconstructions are obtained by combining pollen-based estimates of vegetation cover at a limited number of locations with scenarios of past deforestation and output from a dynamic vegetation model. To evaluate uncertainties in the predictions a novel way of constructing joint confidence regions for the entire composition at each prediction location is proposed. The hierarchical model's ability to reconstruct past land cover is evaluated through cross validation for all time periods, and by comparing reconstructions for the recent past to a present day European forest map. The evaluation results are promising, and the model is able to capture known structures in past land-cover compositions.

Details

Authors
Organisations
External organisations
  • Technical University of Denmark
  • Tallinn University of Technology
  • Linnaeus University
Research areas and keywords

Subject classification (UKÄ) – MANDATORY

  • Physical Geography
  • Probability Theory and Statistics

Keywords

  • Adaptive Metropolis adjusted Langevin, Confidence regions, Dirichlet observation, Gaussian Markov Random Field, Pollen records
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)14-31
Number of pages18
JournalSpatial Statistics
Volume24
Publication statusPublished - 2018 Apr 1
Publication categoryResearch
Peer-reviewedYes