Molecular profiling in muscle-invasive bladder cancer: more than the sum of its parts
Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article
Standard
Molecular profiling in muscle-invasive bladder cancer : more than the sum of its parts. / Sjödahl, Gottfrid; Jackson, Chelsea L.; Bartlett, John M.S.; Siemens, D. Robert; Berman, David M.
In: Journal of Pathology, Vol. 247, No. 5, 2019, p. 563-573.Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article
Harvard
APA
CBE
MLA
Vancouver
Author
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Molecular profiling in muscle-invasive bladder cancer
T2 - more than the sum of its parts
AU - Sjödahl, Gottfrid
AU - Jackson, Chelsea L.
AU - Bartlett, John M.S.
AU - Siemens, D. Robert
AU - Berman, David M.
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - Bladder cancers are biologically and clinically heterogeneous. Recent large-scale transcriptomic profiling studies focusing on life-threatening muscle-invasive cases have demonstrated a small number of molecularly distinct clusters that largely explain their heterogeneity. Similar to breast cancer, these clusters reflect intrinsic urothelial cell-type differentiation programs, including those with luminal and basal cell characteristics. Also like breast cancer, each cell-based subtype demonstrates a distinct profile with regard to its prognosis and its expression of therapeutic targets. Indeed, a number of studies suggest subtype-specific differential responses to cytotoxic chemotherapy and to therapies that inhibit a number of targets, including growth factors (EGFR, ERBB2, FGFR) and immune checkpoint (PD1, PDL1) inhibitors. Despite burgeoning evidence for important clinical implications, subtyping has yet to enter into routine clinical practice. Here we review the conceptual basis for intrinsic cell subtyping in muscle-invasive bladder cancer and discuss evidence behind proposed clinical uses for subtyping as a prognostic or predictive test. In deliberating barriers to clinical implementation, we review pitfalls associated with transcriptomic profiling and illustrate a simple immunohistochemistry (IHC)-based subtyping algorithm that may serve as a faster, less expensive alternative. Envisioned as a research tool that can easily be translated into routine pathology workflow, IHC-based profiling has the potential to more rapidly establish the utility (or lack thereof) of cell type profiling in clinical practice.
AB - Bladder cancers are biologically and clinically heterogeneous. Recent large-scale transcriptomic profiling studies focusing on life-threatening muscle-invasive cases have demonstrated a small number of molecularly distinct clusters that largely explain their heterogeneity. Similar to breast cancer, these clusters reflect intrinsic urothelial cell-type differentiation programs, including those with luminal and basal cell characteristics. Also like breast cancer, each cell-based subtype demonstrates a distinct profile with regard to its prognosis and its expression of therapeutic targets. Indeed, a number of studies suggest subtype-specific differential responses to cytotoxic chemotherapy and to therapies that inhibit a number of targets, including growth factors (EGFR, ERBB2, FGFR) and immune checkpoint (PD1, PDL1) inhibitors. Despite burgeoning evidence for important clinical implications, subtyping has yet to enter into routine clinical practice. Here we review the conceptual basis for intrinsic cell subtyping in muscle-invasive bladder cancer and discuss evidence behind proposed clinical uses for subtyping as a prognostic or predictive test. In deliberating barriers to clinical implementation, we review pitfalls associated with transcriptomic profiling and illustrate a simple immunohistochemistry (IHC)-based subtyping algorithm that may serve as a faster, less expensive alternative. Envisioned as a research tool that can easily be translated into routine pathology workflow, IHC-based profiling has the potential to more rapidly establish the utility (or lack thereof) of cell type profiling in clinical practice.
KW - bladder neoplasms
KW - cancer stem cell
KW - GATA3
KW - KRT5
KW - LUNDTAX
KW - PPARG
KW - RB1
KW - Shh
KW - TGFB
KW - TP53
U2 - 10.1002/path.5230
DO - 10.1002/path.5230
M3 - Review article
C2 - 30604486
AN - SCOPUS:85061917639
VL - 247
SP - 563
EP - 573
JO - Journal of Pathology
JF - Journal of Pathology
SN - 0022-3417
IS - 5
ER -