No bias of ignored bilaterality when analysing the revision risk of knee prostheses: analysis of a population based sample of 44,590 patients with 55,298 knee prostheses from the national Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bibtex

@article{12b372af6d9d4698ab564f2530b5f43c,
title = "No bias of ignored bilaterality when analysing the revision risk of knee prostheses: analysis of a population based sample of 44,590 patients with 55,298 knee prostheses from the national Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register.",
keywords = "Preschool, Registries: statistics & numerical data, Risk Assessment: standards, Support, Non-U.S. Gov't, Sweden: epidemiology, Population Surveillance: methods, Osteoarthritis: epidemiology, Osteoarthritis: surgery, Middle Aged, Male, Knee Prosthesis: statistics & numerical data, Newborn, Female, Human, Infant, Knee: statistics & numerical data, Bias (Epidemiology), Child, Replacement, Rheumatoid: surgery, Arthroplasty, Rheumatoid: epidemiology, Arthritis, 80 and over, Adolescent, Adult, Aged",
author = "Otto Robertsson and Jonas Ranstam",
year = "2003",
doi = "10.1186/1471-2474-4-1",
language = "English",
volume = "4",
journal = "BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders",
issn = "1471-2474",
publisher = "BioMed Central",
number = "1",

}