Questions of Method in James Dunn's Jesus Remembered

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Parts of Dunn's methodology in "Jesus Remembered" (2003) are scrutinised: the meaning of "memory" and whether this is the ultimately attainable object of historiography. I contend that historical research should not content itself with investigating how memories are "fictionalized", i.e. retained in narrative form, but press on to verified judgments on historical facts. "Grand (or: master) narratives", i.e. large-scale, holistic frameworks for the interpretation of data are - critically used - more important for historical work than Dunn wants to admit.

This is the final, accepted and revised manuscript of this article. Use alternative location to go to the published article. Requires subscription.

Details

Authors
Organisations
Research areas and keywords

Subject classification (UKÄ) – MANDATORY

  • Religious Studies

Keywords

  • Jesus research, memory, oral tradition, fictionalization or refiguration of memories, grand narratives, historical fact, master narrative, critical realism, meaning of "history"
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)445-457
JournalJournal for the Study of the New Testament
Volume26
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - 2004
Publication categoryResearch
Peer-reviewedYes

Bibliographic note

The information about affiliations in this record was updated in December 2015. The record was previously connected to the following departments: Centre for Theology and Religious Studies (015017000)

Total downloads

No data available