Semiosis and the elusive final interpretant of understanding
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
Standard
Semiosis and the elusive final interpretant of understanding. / Sonesson, Göran.
In: Semiotica, Vol. 179, No. 1-4, 2010, p. 145-258.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
Harvard
APA
CBE
MLA
Vancouver
Author
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Semiosis and the elusive final interpretant of understanding
AU - Sonesson, Göran
PY - 2010
Y1 - 2010
N2 - While the conceptual history of the sign, as recounted by John Deely in Four ages of understanding, is immensely enlightening, history is never enough. If, before Augustine, it had occurred to no one that such diverse phenomena as are covered by this term had something in common, and if, in the time of Aquinas, Fonseca, and Poinsot, different usages of the term were in competition, the reason is not simply intellectual confusion, but rather that meaning is of many kinds. In this essay, I have shifted the terrain from socio-history to phylogeny and ontogeny, suggesting that, in the child, as well as in the human species, perception is the primary type of meaning, whereas true signs are acquired much later, followed by signs systems and organism-independent artifacts. The whole point of having a semiotic theory, it is argued, is to be able to account for the differences, and not only the similarities, of different kinds of meaning.
AB - While the conceptual history of the sign, as recounted by John Deely in Four ages of understanding, is immensely enlightening, history is never enough. If, before Augustine, it had occurred to no one that such diverse phenomena as are covered by this term had something in common, and if, in the time of Aquinas, Fonseca, and Poinsot, different usages of the term were in competition, the reason is not simply intellectual confusion, but rather that meaning is of many kinds. In this essay, I have shifted the terrain from socio-history to phylogeny and ontogeny, suggesting that, in the child, as well as in the human species, perception is the primary type of meaning, whereas true signs are acquired much later, followed by signs systems and organism-independent artifacts. The whole point of having a semiotic theory, it is argued, is to be able to account for the differences, and not only the similarities, of different kinds of meaning.
KW - psychology
KW - ecological
KW - phenomenology
KW - Umwelt
KW - picture
KW - sign
KW - intentionality
U2 - 10.1515/semi.2010.023
DO - 10.1515/semi.2010.023
M3 - Article
VL - 179
SP - 145
EP - 258
JO - Semiotica
JF - Semiotica
SN - 0037-1998
IS - 1-4
ER -