Systems for Theory-Of-Mind : Taking the Second-Person Perspective
Research output: Contribution to conference › Paper, not in proceeding
Standard
Systems for Theory-Of-Mind : Taking the Second-Person Perspective. / Brinck, Ingar.
2014. 1-19 Paper presented at 20th Meeting of the European Society for Philosophy and Psychology, .Research output: Contribution to conference › Paper, not in proceeding
Harvard
APA
CBE
MLA
Vancouver
Author
RIS
TY - CONF
T1 - Systems for Theory-Of-Mind : Taking the Second-Person Perspective
AU - Brinck, Ingar
PY - 2014
Y1 - 2014
N2 - Apperly's and Butterfill's (2009) theory about belief reasoning is taken as a starting-point for a discussion of how we make sense of other people's actions in real time. More specifically, the focus lies on how we can understand others' actions in terms of their epistemic states on an implicit level of processing. First, the relevant parts of Apperly's and Butterfill's theory are summarized. Then, their account of implicit theory of mind in terms of registration ascription and perceptual encountering is discussed and rejected. While accepting Apperly's and Butterfill's general epistemic account of belief reasoning, the author suggests that implicit theory of mind involves visuomotor, second-person pragmatic representations. Moreover, this presentation emphasizes the central place of interaction, claiming that perceptual intentions-to-interact are fundamental to social understanding. Via the mechanism of social attention, social intentions automatically prompt agents to share and exchange sensorimotor, pragmatic information.
AB - Apperly's and Butterfill's (2009) theory about belief reasoning is taken as a starting-point for a discussion of how we make sense of other people's actions in real time. More specifically, the focus lies on how we can understand others' actions in terms of their epistemic states on an implicit level of processing. First, the relevant parts of Apperly's and Butterfill's theory are summarized. Then, their account of implicit theory of mind in terms of registration ascription and perceptual encountering is discussed and rejected. While accepting Apperly's and Butterfill's general epistemic account of belief reasoning, the author suggests that implicit theory of mind involves visuomotor, second-person pragmatic representations. Moreover, this presentation emphasizes the central place of interaction, claiming that perceptual intentions-to-interact are fundamental to social understanding. Via the mechanism of social attention, social intentions automatically prompt agents to share and exchange sensorimotor, pragmatic information.
KW - pragmatic representation
KW - social intention
KW - social attention
KW - implicit theory of mind
KW - registration ascription
KW - embodiment
KW - social understanding
KW - belief reasoning
M3 - Paper, not in proceeding
SP - 1
EP - 19
T2 - 20th Meeting of the European Society for Philosophy and Psychology
Y2 - 28 August 2012 through 31 August 2012
ER -