The defeasible nature of coherentist justification

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The impossibility results of Bovens and Hartmann (2003, Bayesian epistemology. Oxford: Clarendon Press) and Olsson (2005, Against coherence: Truth, probability and justification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.) show that the link between coherence and probability is not as strong as some have supposed. This paper is an attempt to bring out a way in which coherence reasoning nevertheless can be justified, based on the idea that, even if it does not provide an infallible guide to probability, it can give us an indication thereof. It is further shown that this actually is the case, for several of the coherence measures discussed in the literature so far. We also discuss how this affects the possibility to use coherence as a means of epistemic justification.

Details

Authors
  • Staffan Angere
Organisations
Research areas and keywords

Subject classification (UKÄ) – MANDATORY

  • Philosophy

Keywords

  • defeasible justification, measure theory, Coherence
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)321-335
JournalSynthese
Volume157
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 2007
Publication categoryResearch
Peer-reviewedYes