The game of Inquiry

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

I. Levi has advocated a decision-theoretic account of belief revision. We argue that the game-theoretic framework of Interrogative Inquiry Games, proposed by J. Hintikka, can extend and clarify this account. We show that some strategic use of the game rules (or ‘policies’) generate Expansions, Contractions and Revisions, and we give representation results. We then extend the framework to represent explicitly (multiple) sources of answers, and apply it to discuss the Recovery Postulate. We conclude with some remarks about the potential extensions of interrogative games, with respect to some issues in the theory of belief change.

Details

Authors
External organisations
  • External Organization - Unknown
Research areas and keywords

Subject classification (UKÄ) – MANDATORY

  • Philosophy
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)271-289
JournalSynthese
Volume171
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 2009
Publication categoryResearch
Peer-reviewedYes
Externally publishedYes

Related research output

Emmanuel J. Genot, 2018, In : Synthese. 195, 5, p. 2065-2088

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Emmanuel Genot, 2011, Belief Revision Meets Philosophy of Science. Olsson, E. J. & Enqvist, S. (eds.). Springer, Vol. 21. p. 225-252

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingBook chapter

View all (2)