The Monastic Paradox: Desert Ascetics as Founders, Fathers, and Benefactors in Early Christian Historiography

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This is a study of three literary sources from the late fourth and early fifth centuries CE that depict the rise of monasticism, the anonymous History of the Monks of Egypt, the History of the Monks of Syria by Theodoret of Cyrrhus, and Sozomen's Church History. Although each of these texts conveys what Peter Brown has termed the "myth of the desert," i.e. a portrayal of monks as being part of another world, I argue that the same texts also reflect a "myth of the city," in which the monastic movement is depicted as a civic institution with regard to its foundation, regulation, and influence in the world. What these texts reflect is an attempt from the side of Christian authors to make sense of the multifaceted phenomenon that was monasticism, creating a conceptual space where different ascetic expressions come together as one, as 'monasticism' or as a desert city.

Details

Authors
Organisations
Research areas and keywords

Subject classification (UKÄ) – MANDATORY

  • History of Religions

Keywords

  • civic identity, hagiography, Historia monachorum, historiography, institutionalization, late antiquity, monasticism, Sozomen, Theodoret of Cyrrhus
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)283-317
Number of pages35
JournalVigiliae Christianae
Volume72
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 2018 Jan 1
Publication categoryResearch
Peer-reviewedYes