The notion of agency and the material engagement theory: An Agentive statement
Research output: Contribution to conference › Other
Malafouris (2013) proposes that agency is an emergent product of the relational ontology of our material engagement. However, I suggest a distinction between meaning and agency for a better understanding of our relational ontology with things. Meaning is the payoff of the relational ontology, meaning emerges when an agent act within the world. Agency is the capability to act, signify, produce and obtain meaning, and this capability is exclusive of living organisms. The distinction does not imply to fall in Cartesianism. Agentive semiotics (Niño 2015; Mendoza-Collazos 2016), for instance, is far from an anthropocentric or Cartesian conception of the way the agency operates. The treatment that agentive semiotics proposes for the exclusiveness of agency in living organisms could enhance the force of Malafouris' relational approach, explaining the key role of material culture without methodological fetishism.
|Research areas and keywords||
Subject classification (UKÄ) – MANDATORY
|Number of pages||1|
|Publication status||Published - 2019|
|Event||12th Conference of the IAVS-AISV: Visual semiotics goes cognitive - Centre for Languages and Literature, Lund University, Lund, Sweden|
Duration: 2019 Aug 22 → 2019 Aug 24
Conference number: 12
|Conference||12th Conference of the IAVS-AISV|
|Period||2019/08/22 → 2019/08/24|
This paper is one-author paper, it was presented in a round table for discussion on agency with other authors and plenary speakers.