The Swedish Academy #MeToo Scandal and the Reputation of the Nobel Prize

Research output: Other contributionMiscellaneous


In May 2018, the Swedish Academy was engulfed in a #MeToo scandal that threatened its reputation, especially its reputation as the organization that awards the Nobel Prize in Literature. This scandal, which was first revealed in the previous November, also raised questions about the reputation of the Nobel Prize. The case is about reputation and crisis management, and more specifically about “reputational contagion” – “how one bad apple can spoil the barrel.” Reputational contagion occurs when something that happens in a related entity migrates to the subject entity. The case provides insights into an identity and reputation shaped and shared by several entities, and the potential consequences of a crisis in one of the associated entities. In this case, the reputation of “the world’s most prestigious award” – the Nobel Prize – is at issue.


External organisations
  • Harvard Business School
Research areas and keywords

Subject classification (UKÄ) – MANDATORY

  • Business Administration


  • Nobel Prize, Swedish Academy, Reputation, reputation and crisis management, brand management
Original languageEnglish
Short descriptionHBR Case
Number of pages10
Place of PublicationBoston
Publication statusPublished - 2018 Dec 17
Publication categoryResearch

Publication series

NameHarvard Business School Publishing

Bibliographic note

Anderson, C. (2018) “Swedish Academy Abuse Accusations.” The New York Times, April 7. Anderson, C. (2018) “In Nobel Scandal, a Man Is Accused of Sexual Misconduct. A Woman Takes the Fall”, April 12. Dagens Nyheter (2017) ”Man with Swedish Academy Ties Accused of Sexual Assault”, Evelyn, J. and Gustavsson, M., November 22. English, J.F. (2005) The Economy of Prestige – Prizes, Awards, and the Circulation of Cultural Value. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press. Feldman, B. (2012) The Nobel Prize: A History of Genius, Controversy, and Prestige. New York: Arcade Publishing. Greyser, S.A. (2009) “Corporate Brand Reputation and Brand Crisis Management.” Management Decision 47(4): 590–602. Greyser, S.A. and Urde, M. (2018) “The Reputation of the ‘World’s Most Prestigious Award’: The Nobel Prize.” Harvard Business School, Case 9-919-401. Greyer, S.A. and Urde, M. (2019) “What Does Your Corporate Brand Stand For?”, Harvard Business Review article, (forthcoming) January/February, 2019. Henley, J. (2018) “Sara Danius Resigns Swedish Academy Nobel Prizes.” The Guardian, April 12. Langone, A. (2018) “What’s the Difference between the #MeToo and Time’s Up Movements?” Time, March 22. Schwartz, A. (2018) “The Swedish Academy Sex Scandal and the Illusion of the Nobel Prize in Literature.” The New Yorker, May 5. Shugerman, E. (2017) “Me Too: Why are women sharing stories of sexual assault and how did it start?” Independent, October 17. Sohlman, R. (1983) The Legacy of Alfred Nobel: The story behind the Nobel Prizes. London: Bodly Head. Urde, M., Greyser, S.A., and Balmer, J.M.T. (2007) “Corporate Brands with a Heritage.” Journal of Brand Management 15(1): 4–19. Urde, M. and Greyser, S.A. (2015) “The Nobel Prize: The identity of a corporate heritage brand.” Journal of Product and Brand Management 24(4): 319–332. Urde, M. and Greyser, S.A. (2016) “The Corporate Brand Identity and Reputation Matrix – The Case of the Nobel Prize.” Journal of Brand Management 23: 89–117. Urde, M. and Greyser, S.A. (2014) “The Nobel Prize: A ‘Heritage-based’ Brand oriented Network”, Harvard Business School, Working Paper: 15-010, August 19.