Thirdness as the observer observed: From habit to law by way of Habitus

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingBook chapter

Abstract

In order to study the notion of habit as an instance of Thirdness in Peirce’s work, it is necessary to go back to the intuitions at the basis of Peirce’s categories, trying to spell out concretely, as I think this has not been done before, the meaning of the three categories. This involves entangling the notions of fallibilism and of the collaborative work of the community of scholars, which may not have been taken seriously by most scholars pursuing the Peircean tradition. It is suggested that Peirce’s phenomenology is a version of Husserl’s phenomenology imposing a lot of constraints on the variation in imagination. In order to make sense of habit as Thirdness, we have to extend Peircean phenomenology into Husserlean phenomenology, abandoning the language of degeneracy, which is not very enlightening. Important contributions to the study of habit has also been made by several sociologists and psychologists.

Details

Authors
Organisations
Research areas and keywords

Subject classification (UKÄ) – MANDATORY

  • General Language Studies and Linguistics
  • Philosophy

Keywords

  • Husserl, Mediation, Phaneroscopy, Phenomenology, Thirdness
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationStudies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics
EditorsDonna E. West, Myrdene Anderson
PublisherSpringer International Publishing
Pages283-295
Number of pages13
Volume31
ISBN (Electronic)978-3-319-45920-2
ISBN (Print)978-3-319-45918-9
Publication statusPublished - 2016
Publication categoryResearch
Peer-reviewedYes

Publication series

NameStudies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics
Volume31
ISSN (Print)21926255
ISSN (Electronic)21926263