Väst om öst : Kinaforskning och kinasyn under 1800- och 1900-talen

Research output: ThesisDoctoral Thesis (monograph)

Standard

Väst om öst : Kinaforskning och kinasyn under 1800- och 1900-talen. / Hägerdal, Hans.

Lund University Press, 1996. 361 p.

Research output: ThesisDoctoral Thesis (monograph)

Harvard

APA

Hägerdal, H. (1996). Väst om öst : Kinaforskning och kinasyn under 1800- och 1900-talen. Lund University Press.

CBE

Hägerdal H. 1996. Väst om öst : Kinaforskning och kinasyn under 1800- och 1900-talen. Lund University Press. 361 p.

MLA

Vancouver

Hägerdal H. Väst om öst : Kinaforskning och kinasyn under 1800- och 1900-talen. Lund University Press, 1996. 361 p.

Author

Hägerdal, Hans. / Väst om öst : Kinaforskning och kinasyn under 1800- och 1900-talen. Lund University Press, 1996. 361 p.

RIS

TY - THES

T1 - Väst om öst : Kinaforskning och kinasyn under 1800- och 1900-talen

AU - Hägerdal, Hans

N1 - Defence details Date: 1996-03-30 Time: 10:15 Place: Historiska institutionen, sal 3 External reviewer(s) Name: [unknown], [unknown] Title: [unknown] Affiliation: [unknown] ---

PY - 1996

Y1 - 1996

N2 - The point of departure of the thesis is the ongoing debate on Orientalism initiated by Edward Said, discussed here in the context of the Western image of China. In the view of Western observers, China has frequently played the role of the Other . Compared to the negative sense that Said and others have given to Orientalism in recent years, as a mode of dominating an arbitrarily defined "Orient", China is traditionally well-defined by its own scholarly tradition. The ties between Chinese learning and self-images and Western scholarship on China's civilisation (i.e., Sinology) might also be stronger than such ties in other Oriental regions. Now, the present thesis explores the functioning and approaches of Western Sinology vis-a-vis its object, contrasting the occurrance of Orientalist features in sinological writings (exotism, feeling of positional superiority, a persistant intellectual genealogy, and the acceptence of a Western discourse by indigenous scholars) with a process of professionalisation (forming of a discipline, specialisation, development of method, degree of openness towards academic surrounding). The investigation is built upon three main pillars. Firstly, a prosopographic study of Sinologists reveals a number of patterns as regards choice of study, background, problems of research etc. Secondly, institutional developments of leading Western academic regions are surveyed. Thirdly, an in-depth study is undertaken on scholarly articles on old Chinese history, where three periods of historiographic development are systematically compared (1900-10,1935-45,1970-80). Here, the thesis focuses on method, theoretical inspiration, perspective, values, and extra-scientific influences. It turns out that Orientalist features are clearly discernible in all three periods, though they are strongly outspoken only in the first one. Some types of biases (like unreflected comparativism) may actually increase over time. Still, a strong current of professionalisation, making use also of indigenous scholarship, has tended to dominate more and more, in the process eliminating much of the power of Orientalism in Said's sense.

AB - The point of departure of the thesis is the ongoing debate on Orientalism initiated by Edward Said, discussed here in the context of the Western image of China. In the view of Western observers, China has frequently played the role of the Other . Compared to the negative sense that Said and others have given to Orientalism in recent years, as a mode of dominating an arbitrarily defined "Orient", China is traditionally well-defined by its own scholarly tradition. The ties between Chinese learning and self-images and Western scholarship on China's civilisation (i.e., Sinology) might also be stronger than such ties in other Oriental regions. Now, the present thesis explores the functioning and approaches of Western Sinology vis-a-vis its object, contrasting the occurrance of Orientalist features in sinological writings (exotism, feeling of positional superiority, a persistant intellectual genealogy, and the acceptence of a Western discourse by indigenous scholars) with a process of professionalisation (forming of a discipline, specialisation, development of method, degree of openness towards academic surrounding). The investigation is built upon three main pillars. Firstly, a prosopographic study of Sinologists reveals a number of patterns as regards choice of study, background, problems of research etc. Secondly, institutional developments of leading Western academic regions are surveyed. Thirdly, an in-depth study is undertaken on scholarly articles on old Chinese history, where three periods of historiographic development are systematically compared (1900-10,1935-45,1970-80). Here, the thesis focuses on method, theoretical inspiration, perspective, values, and extra-scientific influences. It turns out that Orientalist features are clearly discernible in all three periods, though they are strongly outspoken only in the first one. Some types of biases (like unreflected comparativism) may actually increase over time. Still, a strong current of professionalisation, making use also of indigenous scholarship, has tended to dominate more and more, in the process eliminating much of the power of Orientalism in Said's sense.

KW - Sinology

KW - discursive formation

KW - the Other

KW - positional superiority

KW - intellectual genealogy

KW - process of professionalisation

KW - Contemporary history (circa 1800 to 1914)

KW - Modern historia (ca. 1800-1914)

KW - Nutidshistoria (från 1914)

KW - Contemporary history (since 1914)

KW - Orientalism

M3 - Doktorsavhandling (monografi)

SN - 91-7966-361-3

PB - Lund University Press

ER -