Verification and validation in industry - a qualitative survey on the state of practice

TY - GEN

T1 - Verification and validation in industry - a qualitative survey on the state of practice

AU - Andersson, Carina

AU - Runeson, Per

PY - 2002

Y1 - 2002

N2 - Verification and validation activities take a substantial share of project budgets and need improvements. This is an accepted truth, but the current practices are seldom assessed and analyzed. In this paper we present a qualitative survey of the verification and validation processes at 11 Swedish companies. The purpose was to exchange experience between the companies and to lay out a foundation for further research on the topic. The survey is conducted through workshop and interview sessions, loosely guided by a questionnaire scheme. It is concluded from the survey that there are substantial differences between small and large companies. In large companies, the documented process is emphasized while in small companies, single key, persons have a dominating impact on the procedures. Large companies use commercial tools while small companies make in-house tools or use shareware. Common to all the surveyed companies is that verification and validation is considered important, and thus having rather high status. Information exchange between companies during the survey was considered to be very valuable to the involved subjects

AB - Verification and validation activities take a substantial share of project budgets and need improvements. This is an accepted truth, but the current practices are seldom assessed and analyzed. In this paper we present a qualitative survey of the verification and validation processes at 11 Swedish companies. The purpose was to exchange experience between the companies and to lay out a foundation for further research on the topic. The survey is conducted through workshop and interview sessions, loosely guided by a questionnaire scheme. It is concluded from the survey that there are substantial differences between small and large companies. In large companies, the documented process is emphasized while in small companies, single key, persons have a dominating impact on the procedures. Large companies use commercial tools while small companies make in-house tools or use shareware. Common to all the surveyed companies is that verification and validation is considered important, and thus having rather high status. Information exchange between companies during the survey was considered to be very valuable to the involved subjects

KW - information exchange

KW - commercial tools

KW - qualitative survey

KW - verification and validation

KW - Swedish companies

KW - interview sessions

KW - workshop sessions

KW - questionnaire scheme

KW - large companies

KW - documented process

KW - small companies

KW - shareware

KW - in-house tools

U2 - 10.1109/ISESE.2002.1166923

DO - 10.1109/ISESE.2002.1166923

M3 - Paper in conference proceeding

SN - 0-7695-1796-X

SP - 37

EP - 47

BT - 2002 International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering Proceedings

PB - IEEE - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.

T2 - 2002 International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering Proceedings

Y2 - 3 October 2002 through 4 October 2002

ER -