Yes, it is all about fetishism: A response to Daniel Cunha
Research output: Contribution to journal › Debate/Note/Editorial
Abstract
Daniel Cunha misreads us as suggesting that climate change has been a conscious and deliberate strategy of a global elite. This was very clearly not our suggestion. He proposes that the Marxian concept of fetishism is applicable to anthropogenic climate change, apparently unaware of our recurrent use of precisely this concept in a number of publications over the past decades. We thus fundamentally agree with his position, but find his critique of our own interpretation of the Anthropocene unfair and misdirected.
Details
| Authors | |
|---|---|
| Organisations | |
| Research areas and keywords | Subject classification (UKÄ) – MANDATORY
|
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 205-207 |
| Number of pages | 3 |
| Journal | The Anthropocene Review |
| Volume | 3 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| Publication status | Published - 2016 |
| Publication category | Research |
| Peer-reviewed | Yes |
