Herlinde Pauer-Studer

Aktivitet: Värd för gäst

Detaljer

Titel Herlinde Pauer-Studer
På besök från
  • University of Vienna
Person och roll
Beskrivning Univ.-Prof. Mag. Dr. Herlinde Pauer-Studer (Universität Wien) gave the self-contained talk: Complicity and Conditions of Agency, a theResearch Seminar in practical philosophy:

Abstract: In his ground-breaking study Complicity, Christopher Kutz introduces the notion of “participatory intentions” (individual intentions whose content is collective) to explain an agent’s complicity with groups or organizations. According to Kutz, participatory intentions allow us to hold individuals morally accountable for collective wrongs independent of their causal contribution to the wrong and its ensuing harm. In my talk I will offer an alternative account of complicity, drawing on philosophical work on constitutive accounts of agency. Its central claim is that an agent’s complicity might be due to the dependence of his professional role on the normative principles that make up the organization or institution in whose practices he partakes. In other words, there might arise a constitutive failure in an agent’s attempt to ascribe to himself a non-complicit professional identity. I use the case of SS-Judge Konrad Morgen in order to illustrate this understanding of complicity. Finally, I will point out some philosophical implications for conceptions of group agency and collective moral responsibility.
Dato/periode

2018 okt 18

Relaterade organisationer
Univ.-Prof. Mag. Dr. Herlinde Pauer-Studer (Universität Wien) gave the self-contained talk: Complicity and Conditions of Agency, a theResearch Seminar in practical philosophy:

Abstract: In his ground-breaking study Complicity, Christopher Kutz introduces the notion of “participatory intentions” (individual intentions whose content is collective) to explain an agent’s complicity with groups or organizations. According to Kutz, participatory intentions allow us to hold individuals morally accountable for collective wrongs independent of their causal contribution to the wrong and its ensuing harm. In my talk I will offer an alternative account of complicity, drawing on philosophical work on constitutive accounts of agency. Its central claim is that an agent’s complicity might be due to the dependence of his professional role on the normative principles that make up the organization or institution in whose practices he partakes. In other words, there might arise a constitutive failure in an agent’s attempt to ascribe to himself a non-complicit professional identity. I use the case of SS-Judge Konrad Morgen in order to illustrate this understanding of complicity. Finally, I will point out some philosophical implications for conceptions of group agency and collective moral responsibility.
2018 okt 18

Värd för gäst

NamnHerlinde Pauer-Studer
Besökares akademiska gradUniv.-Prof. Mag. Dr.
LandÖsterrike
Extern organisation
University of Vienna