Reconstruction and Evaluation of Pro/Con Argument: towards Objective Criteria

Projekt: Forskning

Fler filtreringsmöjligheter
  1. 2014
  2. Commentary on Mark Battersby and Sharon Bailin’s “Critical Thinking and Cognitive Biases.”

    Frank Zenker, 2014, Proceedings of the 10th International Conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (OSSA), 22-26 May 2013. Dima, M. & Marcin, L. (red.). Windsor, ON: OSSA, 7 s.

    Forskningsoutput: Kapitel i bok/rapport/Conference proceedingKonferenspaper i proceeding

  3. Know thy biases! Bringing argumentative virtues to the classroom

    Frank Zenker, 2014, Proceedings of the 10th International Conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (OSSA). Dima, M. & Marcin, L. (red.). OSSA, s. 1-11

    Forskningsoutput: Kapitel i bok/rapport/Conference proceedingKonferenspaper i proceeding

  4. Pro-et-contra Argumentation : Gründe, Werte, Kompromisse (Reasons, Values, Compromises).

    Frank Zenker, 2014, Wissenwert, 2014, 1, s. 20-29.

    Forskningsoutput: Bidrag till övrig tidskrift/dags- eller nyhetstidningArtikel i facktidskrift eller populärpress

  5. Review of Spohn, W. The Laws of Belief (2012). Oxford: OUP.

    Frank Zenker, 2014, (Accepted/In press) I: Philosophical Quarterly.

    Forskningsoutput: TidskriftsbidragRecension av bok/film/utställning etc.

  6. 2013
  7. In Support of the Weak Rhetoric as Epistemic Thesis. On the Generality and Reliability of Persuasion Knowledge

    Frank Zenker, 2013, Verbal and Visual Rhetoric in a Media World. H. van, B., P., G., B. van, G., D. van de, M. & K., R. (red.). Leiden University Press, s. 61-76

    Forskningsoutput: Kapitel i bok/rapport/Conference proceedingKapitel samlingsverk

  8. What do Normative Approaches to Argumentation Stand to Gain from Rhetorical Insights

    Frank Zenker, 2013, I: Philosophy & Rhetoric. 46, 4, s. 415-436

    Forskningsoutput: TidskriftsbidragArtikel i vetenskaplig tidskrift

  9. 2011
  10. Deduction, Induction, Conduction. An Attempt at Unifying Natural Language Argument Structures

    Frank Zenker, 2011, Conductive Argument: An Overlooked Type of Defeasible Reasoning. John A., B. & Ralph H., J. (red.). College Publications, s. 74-85

    Forskningsoutput: Kapitel i bok/rapport/Conference proceedingKapitel samlingsverk