A Novel Method to Estimate Iliac Tortuosity in Evaluating EVAR Access

Forskningsoutput: TidskriftsbidragArtikel i vetenskaplig tidskrift

Abstract

Purpose:
To subjectively and objectively evaluate the methods used for preoperative assessment of iliac artery tortuosity in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA).

Methods:
Iliac artery tortuosity was assessed retrospectively in 188 patients (160 men; mean age 73 years) diagnosed with AAA at our clinic in 2006 and 2007. All patients underwent preoperative computed tomography (CT) with predominantly thin-slice acquisitions. CT data were analyzed in a dedicated 3-dimensional workstation to perform centerline-of-flow measurements on 376 iliac arteries. Iliac tortuosity was evaluated using the following methods: (1) subjective grading (none, mild, moderate, severe) by 2 experienced observers, (2) calculating the modified iliac tortuosity index based on the published reporting standards for endovascular aneurysm repair, and (3) using the shortest distance between the aortic bifurcation and the common femoral artery (CFA) on axial CT scans as a surrogate for the tortuosity index. Correlation between the objective methods was assessed, and all 3 methods were evaluated for intra- and interobserver agreement. Results: (1) The intra- and interobserver agreement was substantial (κ = 0.71 and κ = 0.65, respectively) for subjective grading, but few variations were found in the calculated tortuosity indexes between the subjective groups. (2) Intra- and interobserver correlations when measuring the iliac tortuosity index were strong (r = 0.94 and r = 0.79, respectively), with good intra- and interobserver agreement. (3) The new method had a strong correlation with iliac tortuosity index (r = 0.78); segregating the iliac arteries into 3 length categories (<10 cm, 10-15 cm, >15 cm), the mean iliac tortuosity indexes were 2.0±0.37, 1.6±0.21, and 1.1±0.27, respectively (p<0.001). This strong correlation was not seen when measuring the iliac artery length in CLF reconstruction (r = 0.31), proving little variation in CLF length among patients.

Conclusion:
Subjective grading of iliac artery tortuosity had substantial agreement between investigators but cannot be recommended as a surrogate for the tortuosity index in access evaluation. The iliac artery tortuosity index is most accurate, but complex and time-consuming. As the CLF length varies only slightly among patients, the new method using the shortest aortic bifurcation-CFA distance on an axial CT scan is a good substitute for the iliac tortuosity index and can often replace it clinically.

Detaljer

Författare
Enheter & grupper
Forskningsområden

Ämnesklassifikation (UKÄ) – OBLIGATORISK

  • Kardiologi

Nyckelord

Originalspråkengelska
Sidor (från-till)157-164
TidskriftJournal of Endovascular Therapy
Volym19
Utgåva nummer2
StatusPublished - 2012
PublikationskategoriForskning
Peer review utfördJa