A typology of loss and damage perspectives

Forskningsoutput: TidskriftsbidragÖversiktsartikel

Abstract

Loss and Damage (L&D) has been the subject of contentious debate in international climate policy for several decades. Recently, formal mechanisms on L&D have been established, but arguably through unclear language. This ambiguity is politically important, but researchers and practitioners require clearer understandings of L&D. Here we report on the first in-depth empirical study of actor perspectives, including interviews with 38 key stakeholders in research, practice, and policy. We find points of agreement and also important distinctions in terms of: the relationship between L&D and adaptation, the emphasis on avoiding versus addressing L&D, the relevance of anthropogenic climate change, and the role of justice. A typology of four perspectives is identified, with different implications for research priorities and actions to address L&D. This typology enables improved understanding of existing perspectives and so has potential to facilitate more transparent discussion of the options available to address L&D.

Detaljer

Författare
  • Emily Boyd
  • Rachel A. James
  • Richard G. Jones
  • Hannah R. Young
  • Friederike E L Otto
Enheter & grupper
Externa organisationer
  • University of Reading
  • University of Oxford
  • University of Cape Town
  • Met Office
Forskningsområden

Ämnesklassifikation (UKÄ) – OBLIGATORISK

  • Klimatforskning
Originalspråkengelska
Sidor (från-till)723-729
Antal sidor7
TidskriftNature Climate Change
Volym7
Utgåva nummer10
StatusPublished - 2017 sep 29
PublikationskategoriForskning
Peer review utfördJa