Advanced radiological work-up as an adjunct to decision in early reconstructive surgery in brachial plexus injuries

Forskningsoutput: TidskriftsbidragArtikel i vetenskaplig tidskrift

Standard

Advanced radiological work-up as an adjunct to decision in early reconstructive surgery in brachial plexus injuries. / Abul-Kasim, Kasim; Backman, Clas; Björkman, Anders; Dahlin, Lars B.

I: Journal of Brachial Plexus and Peripheral Nerve Injury, Vol. 5, Nr. 1, 14, 08.07.2010.

Forskningsoutput: TidskriftsbidragArtikel i vetenskaplig tidskrift

Harvard

APA

CBE

MLA

Vancouver

Author

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Advanced radiological work-up as an adjunct to decision in early reconstructive surgery in brachial plexus injuries

AU - Abul-Kasim, Kasim

AU - Backman, Clas

AU - Björkman, Anders

AU - Dahlin, Lars B.

PY - 2010/7/8

Y1 - 2010/7/8

N2 - Background: As neurophysiologic tests may not reveal the extent of brachial plexus injury at the early stage, the role of early radiological work-up has become increasingly important. The aim of the study was to evaluate the concordance between the radiological and clinical findings with the intraoperative findings in adult patients with brachial plexus injuries.Methods: Seven consecutive male patients (median age 33; range 15-61) with brachial plexus injuries, caused by motor cycle accidents in 5/7 patients, who underwent extensive radiological work-up with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography myelography (CT-M) or both were included in this retrospective study. A total of 34 spinal nerve roots were evaluated by neuroradiologists at two different occasions. The degree of agreement between the radiological findings of every individual nerve root and the intraoperative findings was estimated by calculation of kappa coefficient (K{cyrillic}-value). Using the operative findings as a gold standard, the accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of the clinical findings and the radiological findings were estimated.Results: The diagnostic accuracy of radiological findings was 88% compared with 65% for the clinical findings. The concordance between the radiological findings and the intraoperative findings was substantial (K{cyrillic} = 0.76) compared with only fair (K{cyrillic} = 0.34) for the clinical findings. There were two false positive and two false negative radiological findings (sensitivity and PPV of 0.90; specificity and NPV of 0.87).Conclusions: The advanced optimized radiological work-up used showed high reliability and substantial agreement with the intraoperative findings in adult patients with brachial plexus injury.

AB - Background: As neurophysiologic tests may not reveal the extent of brachial plexus injury at the early stage, the role of early radiological work-up has become increasingly important. The aim of the study was to evaluate the concordance between the radiological and clinical findings with the intraoperative findings in adult patients with brachial plexus injuries.Methods: Seven consecutive male patients (median age 33; range 15-61) with brachial plexus injuries, caused by motor cycle accidents in 5/7 patients, who underwent extensive radiological work-up with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography myelography (CT-M) or both were included in this retrospective study. A total of 34 spinal nerve roots were evaluated by neuroradiologists at two different occasions. The degree of agreement between the radiological findings of every individual nerve root and the intraoperative findings was estimated by calculation of kappa coefficient (K{cyrillic}-value). Using the operative findings as a gold standard, the accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of the clinical findings and the radiological findings were estimated.Results: The diagnostic accuracy of radiological findings was 88% compared with 65% for the clinical findings. The concordance between the radiological findings and the intraoperative findings was substantial (K{cyrillic} = 0.76) compared with only fair (K{cyrillic} = 0.34) for the clinical findings. There were two false positive and two false negative radiological findings (sensitivity and PPV of 0.90; specificity and NPV of 0.87).Conclusions: The advanced optimized radiological work-up used showed high reliability and substantial agreement with the intraoperative findings in adult patients with brachial plexus injury.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77955477950&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/1749-7221-5-14

DO - 10.1186/1749-7221-5-14

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:77955477950

VL - 5

JO - Journal of Brachial Plexus and Peripheral Nerve Injury

JF - Journal of Brachial Plexus and Peripheral Nerve Injury

SN - 1749-7221

IS - 1

M1 - 14

ER -