Building Blocks of a Republican Cosmopolitanism: The Modality of Being Free

Forskningsoutput: TidskriftsbidragArtikel i vetenskaplig tidskrift

Standard

Building Blocks of a Republican Cosmopolitanism: The Modality of Being Free. / Halldenius, Lena.

I: European Journal of Political Theory, Vol. 9, Nr. 1, 2010, s. 12-30.

Forskningsoutput: TidskriftsbidragArtikel i vetenskaplig tidskrift

Harvard

APA

CBE

MLA

Vancouver

Author

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Building Blocks of a Republican Cosmopolitanism: The Modality of Being Free

AU - Halldenius, Lena

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - A structural affinity between republican freedom as non-domination and human rights claims accounts for the relevance of republicanism for cosmopolitan concerns. Central features of republican freedom is its institution dependence and the modal aspect it adds to being free. Its chief concern is not constraint, but the way in which an agent is constrained or not. To the extent I am vulnerable to someone’s dispositional power over me I am not free, even if I am not in fact constrained. Republican freedom adds a substantial element to a justification of human rights in terms of entitlement, rather than mere satisfaction of interests. A satisfied interest is not a satisfied right if the satisfaction is dependent on personal good-will and can be withdrawn at any time. Like republican freedom, human rights claims add a modal aspect to enjoyment. Both can be violated by institutional arrangement alone and can be secured only within accountable institutions. National borders may well be irrelevant to the dispositional powers to which people are vulnerable. An international set of institutions globalizes those circumstances in which republican liberty arises as a concern.

AB - A structural affinity between republican freedom as non-domination and human rights claims accounts for the relevance of republicanism for cosmopolitan concerns. Central features of republican freedom is its institution dependence and the modal aspect it adds to being free. Its chief concern is not constraint, but the way in which an agent is constrained or not. To the extent I am vulnerable to someone’s dispositional power over me I am not free, even if I am not in fact constrained. Republican freedom adds a substantial element to a justification of human rights in terms of entitlement, rather than mere satisfaction of interests. A satisfied interest is not a satisfied right if the satisfaction is dependent on personal good-will and can be withdrawn at any time. Like republican freedom, human rights claims add a modal aspect to enjoyment. Both can be violated by institutional arrangement alone and can be secured only within accountable institutions. National borders may well be irrelevant to the dispositional powers to which people are vulnerable. An international set of institutions globalizes those circumstances in which republican liberty arises as a concern.

KW - entitlement

KW - dispositional power

KW - republican freedom

KW - human rights

KW - institutions

KW - modality

M3 - Article

VL - 9

SP - 12

EP - 30

JO - European Journal of Political Theory

JF - European Journal of Political Theory

SN - 1741-2730

IS - 1

ER -