Civil Society and the Democratic Peace

Forskningsoutput: TidskriftsbidragArtikel i vetenskaplig tidskrift

Abstract

We theorize that three distinct structures of democratic constraint explain why more democratic dyads do not engage in military conflict with each other. We build on earlier theories that focused on electoral and horizontal accountability. We add a new dimension—the social accountability provided by an active civil society. Using several new measures from the Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) data set, we stringently test these explanations. We find social accountability to be the strongest and most consistent predictor of nonbelligerence in dyads, that horizontal accountability is still important, but that the independent role of electoral accountability has been somewhat overstated. However, we do find that social and electoral accountability work strongly together, to make for an even greater effect. The finding is robust to a range of specifications and in the face of controls for contending theories that challenge the democratic peace (e.g., the capitalist and territorial peace theories).

Detaljer

Författare
Enheter & grupper
Externa organisationer
  • Uppsala universitet
  • Peace Research Institute Oslo (PRIO)
  • University of Florida
Forskningsområden

Ämnesklassifikation (UKÄ) – OBLIGATORISK

  • Statsvetenskap (exklusive studier av offentlig förvaltning och globaliseringsstudier)

Nyckelord

Originalspråkengelska
Sidor (från-till)32-62
TidskriftJournal of Conflict Resolution
Volym64
Utgåva nummer1
Tidigt onlinedatum2019 maj 30
StatusPublished - 2020
PublikationskategoriForskning
Peer review utfördJa