Conclusiveness resolves the conflict between quality of evidence and imprecision in GRADE

Forskningsoutput: TidskriftsbidragArtikel i vetenskaplig tidskrift

Standard

Conclusiveness resolves the conflict between quality of evidence and imprecision in GRADE. / Anttila, Sten; Persson, Johannes; Vareman, Niklas; Sahlin, Nils-Eric.

I: Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, Vol. 2016, Nr. 75, JCE9148, 18.06.2016, s. 1-5.

Forskningsoutput: TidskriftsbidragArtikel i vetenskaplig tidskrift

Harvard

APA

CBE

MLA

Vancouver

Author

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Conclusiveness resolves the conflict between quality of evidence and imprecision in GRADE

AU - Anttila, Sten

AU - Persson, Johannes

AU - Vareman, Niklas

AU - Sahlin, Nils-Eric

PY - 2016/6/18

Y1 - 2016/6/18

N2 - The objective of our article is to show how “quality of evidence” and “imprecision,” as they are defined in Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) articles, may lead to confusion. We focus only on the context of systematic reviews.

AB - The objective of our article is to show how “quality of evidence” and “imprecision,” as they are defined in Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) articles, may lead to confusion. We focus only on the context of systematic reviews.

KW - GRADE

KW - Imprecision

KW - Conclusiveness

KW - Accuracy

KW - Confidence in estimate

KW - Quality of evidence

U2 - 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.03.019

DO - 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.03.019

M3 - Article

VL - 2016

SP - 1

EP - 5

JO - Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

JF - Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

SN - 1878-5921

IS - 75

M1 - JCE9148

ER -