Eye Size, Fovea, and Foraging Ecology in Accipitriform Raptors

Forskningsoutput: TidskriftsbidragArtikel i vetenskaplig tidskrift

Abstract

Birds with larger eyes are predicted to have higher spatial resolution because of their larger retinal image. Raptors are well known for their acute vision, mediated by their deep central fovea. Because foraging strategies may demand specific visual adaptations, eye size and fovea may differ between species with different foraging ecology. We tested whether predators (actively hunting mobile prey) and carrion eaters (eating dead prey) from the order Accipitriformes differ in eye size, foveal depth, and retinal thickness using spectral domain optical coherence tomography and comparative phylogenetic methods. We found that (1) all studied predators (except one) had a central and a temporal fovea, but all carrion eaters had only the central fovea; (2) eye size scaled with body mass both in predators and carrion eaters; (3) predators had larger eyes relative to body mass and a thicker retina at the edge of the fovea than carrion eaters, but there was no difference in the depth of the central fovea between the groups. Finally, we found that (4) larger eyes generally had a deeper central fovea. These results suggest that the visual system of raptors within the order Accipitriformes may be highly adapted to the foraging strategy, except for the foveal depth, which seems mostly dependent upon the eye size.

Detaljer

Författare
  • Simon Potier
  • Mindaugas Mitkus
  • Francesco Bonadonna
  • Olivier Duriez
  • Pierre François Isard
  • Thomas Dulaurent
  • Marielle Mentek
  • Almut Kelber
Enheter & grupper
Externa organisationer
  • University of Montpellier
  • Paul Valéry University of Montpellier
  • Centre Hospitalier Vétérinaire Saint-Martin
Forskningsområden

Ämnesklassifikation (UKÄ) – OBLIGATORISK

  • Ekologi

Nyckelord

Originalspråkengelska
Sidor (från-till)232-242
TidskriftBrain, Behavior and Evolution
Volym90
Utgåva nummer3
Tidigt onlinedatum2017 okt 12
StatusPublished - 2017
PublikationskategoriForskning
Peer review utfördJa