How to use indicators to measure scientific performance: A balanced approach

Forskningsoutput: TidskriftsbidragArtikel i vetenskaplig tidskrift

Abstract

Scientific performance should not be measured by a one-dimensional metric such as publication, since it is a multi-dimensional phenomenon. A quantitative analysis of the activities of research groups in three scientific fields demonstrates in particular the importance of sufficient numbers of PhD graduates and of contributions to the infrastructure of the scientific community, in terms of editorships or memberships of boards, etc. The results of a quantitative analysis are largely confirmed by a parallel qualitative investigation; however, both approaches complement each other by highlighting different aspects. For example, the qualitative approach conveys explicitly the demand structure for intermediary and final outputs in the qualitative approach that interlinks the activities of different research units. The results show that it is important for science policy to set appropriate incentives for all dimensions of scientific activities, i.e. not publication output exclusively, as this entails considerable hazard of distortion, endangering the sustainability of scientific research.

Detaljer

Författare
  • Ulrich Schmoch
  • Torben Schubert
  • Dorothea Jansen
  • Richard Heidler
  • Regina von Görtz
Externa organisationer
  • Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research
  • German University of Administrative Sciences, Speyer
  • German Research Institute for Public Administration
  • Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
Forskningsområden

Ämnesklassifikation (UKÄ) – OBLIGATORISK

  • Ekonomi och näringsliv

Nyckelord

Originalspråkengelska
Sidor (från-till)2-18
Antal sidor17
TidskriftResearch Evaluation
Volym19
Utgåva nummer1
StatusPublished - 2010 mar
PublikationskategoriForskning
Peer review utfördJa
Externt publiceradJa