Improved Outcomes After Regional Implementation of Sepsis Alert: A Novel Triage Model

Forskningsoutput: TidskriftsbidragArtikel i vetenskaplig tidskrift

Standard

Improved Outcomes After Regional Implementation of Sepsis Alert : A Novel Triage Model. / Rosenqvist, Mari; Bengtsson-Toni, Maria; Tham, Johan; Lanbeck, Peter; Melander, Olle; Åkesson, Per.

I: Critical Care Medicine, Vol. 48, Nr. 4, 2020, s. 484-490.

Forskningsoutput: TidskriftsbidragArtikel i vetenskaplig tidskrift

Harvard

APA

CBE

MLA

Vancouver

Author

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Improved Outcomes After Regional Implementation of Sepsis Alert

T2 - A Novel Triage Model

AU - Rosenqvist, Mari

AU - Bengtsson-Toni, Maria

AU - Tham, Johan

AU - Lanbeck, Peter

AU - Melander, Olle

AU - Åkesson, Per

PY - 2020

Y1 - 2020

N2 - OBJECTIVES: To assess whether the triage model Sepsis Alert for Emergency Departments results in improved initial care of patients with severe infections. DESIGN: Interventional study comparing patient care before and after the start of a new triage model, including 90-day follow-up. SETTING: Eight emergency departments in Skåne County, Sweden. SUBJECTS: Patients with suspected severe infection. INTERVENTIONS: Patients with severely deviating vital signs and suspected infection were triaged into a designated sepsis line called Sepsis Alert, for rapid evaluation supported by an infectious disease specialist. Also, all emergency department staff participated in a designated sepsis education before the model was introduced. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Medical records were evaluated for a 3-month period 1 year before the triage system was started in 2016 and for a 3-month period 1 year after. Of 195,607 patients admitted to these emergency departments during two 3-month periods, a total of 5,321 patients presented severely abnormal vital signs. Of these, 1,066 patients who presented with fever greater thanor equal to 38°C or history of fever/chills were considered to be patients at risk of having severe sepsis. Among patients triaged according to Sepsis Alert, 89.3% received antibiotic treatment within 1 hour after arrival to the emergency department (median time to antibiotics, 26 min), which was significantly better than before the start of the new triage: 67.9% (median time to antibiotics, 37 min) (p < 0.001). Additionally, sepsis treatment quality markers were significantly improved after the introduction of Sepsis Alert, including number of blood cultures and lactate measurements taken, percentage of patients receiving IV fluids, and appropriate initial antibiotic treatment. There were no differences in 28- or 90-day mortality rates. CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of the new triage model Sepsis Alert with special attention to severe sepsis patients led to faster and more accurate antibiotic treatment and improved diagnostic procedures and supportive care.

AB - OBJECTIVES: To assess whether the triage model Sepsis Alert for Emergency Departments results in improved initial care of patients with severe infections. DESIGN: Interventional study comparing patient care before and after the start of a new triage model, including 90-day follow-up. SETTING: Eight emergency departments in Skåne County, Sweden. SUBJECTS: Patients with suspected severe infection. INTERVENTIONS: Patients with severely deviating vital signs and suspected infection were triaged into a designated sepsis line called Sepsis Alert, for rapid evaluation supported by an infectious disease specialist. Also, all emergency department staff participated in a designated sepsis education before the model was introduced. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Medical records were evaluated for a 3-month period 1 year before the triage system was started in 2016 and for a 3-month period 1 year after. Of 195,607 patients admitted to these emergency departments during two 3-month periods, a total of 5,321 patients presented severely abnormal vital signs. Of these, 1,066 patients who presented with fever greater thanor equal to 38°C or history of fever/chills were considered to be patients at risk of having severe sepsis. Among patients triaged according to Sepsis Alert, 89.3% received antibiotic treatment within 1 hour after arrival to the emergency department (median time to antibiotics, 26 min), which was significantly better than before the start of the new triage: 67.9% (median time to antibiotics, 37 min) (p < 0.001). Additionally, sepsis treatment quality markers were significantly improved after the introduction of Sepsis Alert, including number of blood cultures and lactate measurements taken, percentage of patients receiving IV fluids, and appropriate initial antibiotic treatment. There were no differences in 28- or 90-day mortality rates. CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of the new triage model Sepsis Alert with special attention to severe sepsis patients led to faster and more accurate antibiotic treatment and improved diagnostic procedures and supportive care.

U2 - 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004179

DO - 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004179

M3 - Article

VL - 48

SP - 484

EP - 490

JO - Critical Care Medicine

JF - Critical Care Medicine

SN - 1530-0293

IS - 4

ER -