Iran: A Clash of Two Cultures?

Forskningsoutput: Kapitel i bok/rapport/Conference proceedingKapitel samlingsverk


Since the 1979 Revolution, the clerical regime in Iran has been limiting the legal profession’s autonomy by preventing members of the Iranian Bar Association (IBA) from freely electing their Board of Directors and by establishing a new body of lawyers—legal advisors of the judiciary—to contest the IBA’s professional monopoly. Clerics have even attempted to bring the legal profession under the control of the Ministry of Justice and merge it with the legal advisors. The IBA’s struggle to remain a civil society organisation independent of the judiciary offers a vantage point from which to explore the role of the legal profession in Iranian society and the legal system of the Islamic Republic. Why does the Iranian judiciary oppose an independent legal profession, and why does the profession refuse to capitulate? What are the implications of this ongoing conflict for the legal order of the Islamic Republic, whose political elite consists mainly of Islamic jurists? What are the socio-cultural consequences of undermining the integrity and autonomy of the legal profession? These questions will guide our inquiry.

After discussing the IBA’s development before and after the 1979 Revolution, we describe how practising attorneys view the IBA, advocacy, legal practice, legal services and their troubled relationship with the judiciary. They recount the obstacles they encounter within a politicised judicial order and explain how they preserve professional integrity within a legal system that lacks the public’s confidence. We conclude by arguing that the Islamic Republic’s attempt to subordinate the legal profession to administrative and ideological control by the judiciary reflects the clash of two legal cultures. Iranian judges reconstruct and apply Islamic jurisprudence (fiqh) as part of their efforts to deliver substantive justice within a codified legal system, while IBA attorneys understand and seek to practise law consistent with the ideals of due process, certainty and uniformity in legal decision-making.


  • Reza Banakar
  • Ziaee Keyvan
Enheter & grupper


  • legal profession, Iran, Bar Association, Judiciary, Fiqh, law firms, legal education, Shari'a, Civil law, Legal system, conflict, lawyers
Titel på värdpublikationLawyers in 21st Century
Undertitel på gästpublikationVol1: National Reports
RedaktörerAbel Richard, Ole Hammerslev, Hilary Sommerlad, Ulrike Schultz
FörlagHart Publishing Ltd
StatusAccepted/In press - 2019
Peer review utfördNej


Ingen tillgänglig data

Relaterad forskningsoutput

Reza Banakar & Ziaee Keyvan, 2018 jun 26, I: Iranian Studies. 51, 5, s. 717-746 29 s.

Forskningsoutput: TidskriftsbidragArtikel i vetenskaplig tidskrift

Reza Banakar, 2018 maj, I: Digest of Middle East Studies. 27, 1, s. 6-33 27 s., 27(1).

Forskningsoutput: TidskriftsbidragArtikel i vetenskaplig tidskrift

Reza Banakar, 2015 dec 20, I.B. Tauris. 304 s.

Forskningsoutput: Bok/rapportBok

Visa alla (3)

Related projects

Reza Banakar & Ziaee Keyvan


Projekt: Forskning

Visa alla (1)