Italian physiotherapists’ knowledge of and adherence to osteoarthritis clinical practice guidelines: a cross-sectional study

Forskningsoutput: TidskriftsbidragArtikel i vetenskaplig tidskrift

Bibtex

@article{9d2a2f9bcfd9432cab08de99694dbddd,
title = "Italian physiotherapists{\textquoteright} knowledge of and adherence to osteoarthritis clinical practice guidelines: a cross-sectional study",
abstract = "Introduction: Implementation of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) to manage musculoskeletal conditions among physiotherapists appears suboptimal. Osteoarthritis is one of the most disabling conditions worldwide and several studies showed a lack of knowledge of and adherence to osteoarthritis CPGs in physiotherapists{\textquoteright} clinical practice. However, those studies are not conclusive, as they examine the knowledge of and adherence to CPGs only in isolation, or only by focussing on a single treatment. Thus, analysis of the knowledge of and adherence to CPGs in the same sample would allow for a better understanding of the evidence-to-practice gap, which, if unaddressed, can lead to suboptimal care for these patients. This study aims at assessing Italian physiotherapists{\textquoteright} evidence-to-practice gap in osteoarthritis CPGs. Methods: An online survey divided into two sections investigating knowledge of and adherence to CPGs was developed based on three high-quality, recent and relevant CPGs. In the first section, participants had to express their agreement with 24 CPG statements through a 1 (completely disagree) to 5 (completely agree) scale. We defined a ≥ 70% agreement with a statement as consensus. In the second section, participants were shown a clinical case, with different interventions to choose from. Participants were classified as {\textquoteleft}Delivering{\textquoteright} (all recommended interventions selected), {\textquoteleft}Partially Delivering{\textquoteright} (some recommended interventions missing) and {\textquoteleft}Non-Delivering{\textquoteright} (at least one non-recommended interventions selected) the recommended intervention, depending on chosen interventions. Results: 822 physiotherapists (mean age (SD): 35.8 (13.3); female 47%) completed the survey between June and July 2020. In the first section, consensus was achieved for 13/24 statements. In the second section, 25% of the participants were classified as {\textquoteleft}Delivering{\textquoteright}, 22% as {\textquoteleft}Partially Delivering{\textquoteright} and 53% as {\textquoteleft}Non-Delivering{\textquoteright}. Conclusions: Our findings revealed an adequate level of knowledge of osteoarthritis CPGs regarding the importance of exercise and education. However, an adequate level of adherence has yet to be reached, since many physiotherapists did not advise weight reduction, but rest from physical activity, and often included secondary treatments (e.g. manual therapy) supported by low-level evidence. These results identify an evidence-to-practice gap, which may lead to non-evidence based practice behaviours for the management of patients with osteoarthritis.",
keywords = "Clinical governance, Education, public health professional, Osteoarthritis, Osteoarthritis, hip, Osteoarthritis, knee, Physical therapists, Physical therapy specialty, Practice guidelines as topic",
author = "Simone Battista and Stefano Salvioli and Serena Millotti and Marco Testa and Andrea Dell{\textquoteright}Isola",
year = "2021",
month = dec,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1186/s12891-021-04250-4",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
journal = "BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders",
issn = "1471-2474",
publisher = "BioMed Central (BMC)",
number = "1",

}