Logical Dialogues with Explicit Preference Profiles and Strategy Selection

Forskningsoutput: TidskriftsbidragArtikel i vetenskaplig tidskrift

Abstract

The Barth–Krabbe–Hintikka–Hintikka Problem, independently raised by Barth and Krabbe (From axiom to dialogue: a philosophical study of logics and argumentation. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, 1982) and Hintikka and Hintikka (The sign of three: Peirce, Dupin, Holmes. In: Eco U, Sebeok TA (eds) Sherlock Holmes confronts modern logic: Toward a theory of information-seeking through questioning. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, 1983), is the problem of characterizing the strategic reasoning of the players of dialogical logic and game-theoretic semantics games from rational preferences rather than rules. We solve the problem by providing a set of preferences for players with bounded rationality and specifying strategic inferences from those preferences, for a variant of logical dialogues. This solution is generalized to both game-theoretic semantics and orthodox dialogical logic (classical and intuitionistic).

Detaljer

Författare
Enheter & grupper
Forskningsområden

Ämnesklassifikation (UKÄ) – OBLIGATORISK

  • Filosofi
  • Algebra och logik

Nyckelord

Originalspråkengelska
Sidor (från-till)261-291
TidskriftJournal of Logic, Language and Information
Volym26
Utgåva nummer3
Tidigt onlinedatum2017 maj 20
StatusPublished - 2017 sep
PublikationskategoriForskning
Peer review utfördJa

Relaterad forskningsoutput

Justine Jacot, Emmanuel Genot & Frank Zenker, 2016, I: Journal of Applied Logic. 18, s. 105-128

Forskningsoutput: TidskriftsbidragArtikel i vetenskaplig tidskrift

Emmanuel Genot & Justine Jacot, 2014, (Unpublished).

Forskningsoutput: KonferensbidragKonferenspaper, ej i proceeding/ej förlagsutgivet

Emmanuel Genot & Justine Jacot, 2012, (Submitted).

Forskningsoutput: KonferensbidragKonferenspaper, ej i proceeding/ej förlagsutgivet

Visa alla (3)