Organizational discourse analysis - well done or too rare? A reply to our critics

Forskningsoutput: TidskriftsbidragArtikel i vetenskaplig tidskrift

Abstract

In this article we respond to Bargiela-Chiappini, Iedema and Mumby.We notice that there is considerable agreement concerning the state of the art of organizational discourse analysis, while also discussing the disagreements. We expand on some of the ontological issues inherent in our argument, further discuss the character of reductionism in organizational discourse analysis, the trappings of a priori assumptions, and, finally, argue that our critics themselves, perhaps inadvertently, tend to repeat the problematic moves we identified in our original article.

Detaljer

Författare
Enheter & grupper
Forskningsområden

Ämnesklassifikation (UKÄ) – OBLIGATORISK

  • Ekonomi och näringsliv
  • Företagsekonomi

Nyckelord

Originalspråkengelska
Sidor (från-till)1193-1202
TidskriftHuman Relations
Volym64
Utgåva nummer9
StatusPublished - 2011
PublikationskategoriForskning
Peer review utfördJa