Pancreatic beta-cell function evaluated by intravenous glucose and glucagon stimulation. A comparison between insulin and c-peptide to measure insulin secretion
Forskningsoutput: Tidskriftsbidrag › Artikel i vetenskaplig tidskrift
Abstract
Insulin and C-peptide responses to 0.5 g kg-1 intravenous glucose and 1.0 mg glucagon were studied in 34 healthy subjects (age 19-78 years, mean 45). Fasting blood glucose (r=0.59; p<0.001) and glycosylated haemoglobin (r=0.61; p<0.001) increased with age, but not the initial C-peptide and insulin responses to the glucose infusion. However, the C-peptide response at 70 min (r=0.36; p<0.05), 80 min (r=0.41; p<0.05), and 90 min (r=0.46; p<0.01) after the glucose infusion correlated with age as well as both insulin (r=0.42; p<0.05) and C-peptide (r=0.45; p<0.05) responses to the glucagon injection. Reproducibility of insulin and C-peptide responses was evaluated by duplicate tests, separated 2-143 days in time, in 10 healthy subjects (age 19-48 years, mean 32 years) showing no significant differences in median within-subject variation between the initial (1+3 min) or overall (0-90 min area under curve) insulin (24% and 17% respectively) and C-peptide (15% and 14% respectively) responses to glucose, while the within-subject variation for the fasting values and the response to glucagon was higher (p<0.05) for insulin (47% and 32% respectively) than C-peptide (13% and 14% respectively). Between-subject variation was also lower (p<0.001) for C-peptide than for insulin. Thus, C-peptide measurements in healthy subjects are more reproducible than insulin measurements in determination of beta-cell function.
Detaljer
Författare | |
---|---|
Enheter & grupper | |
Externa organisationer |
|
Forskningsområden | Ämnesklassifikation (UKÄ) – OBLIGATORISK
Nyckelord |
Originalspråk | engelska |
---|---|
Sidor (från-till) | 631-639 |
Antal sidor | 9 |
Tidskrift | Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation |
Volym | 52 |
Utgåva nummer | 7 |
Status | Published - 1992 jan 1 |
Publikationskategori | Forskning |
Peer review utförd | Ja |