Plant-wide modelling of phosphorus transformations in wastewater treatment systems: Impacts of control and operational strategies

Forskningsoutput: TidskriftsbidragArtikel i vetenskaplig tidskrift


The objective of this paper is to report the effects that control/operational strategies may have on plant-wide phosphorus (P) transformations in wastewater treatment plants (WWTP). The development of a new set of biological (activated sludge, anaerobic digestion), physico-chemical (aqueous phase, precipitation, mass transfer) process models and model interfaces (between water and sludge line) were required to describe the required tri-phasic (gas, liquid, solid) compound transformations and the close interlinks between the P and the sulfur (S) and iron (Fe) cycles. A modified version of the Benchmark Simulation Model No. 2 (BSM2) (open loop) is used as test platform upon which three different operational alternatives (A1, A2, A3) are evaluated. Rigorous sensor and actuator models are also included in order to reproduce realistic control actions. Model-based analysis shows that the combination of an ammonium (SNHX ) and total suspended solids (XTSS) control strategy (A1) better adapts the system to influent dynamics, improves phosphate (SPO4 ) accumulation by phosphorus accumulating organisms (XPAO) (41%), increases nitrification/denitrification efficiency (18%) and reduces aeration energy (Eaeration) (21%). The addition of iron XFeCl3 ) for chemical P removal (A2) promotes the formation of ferric oxides (XHFO−H, XHFO−L), phosphate adsorption (XHFO−H,P, XHFO−L,P), co-precipitation (XHFO−H,P,old, XHFO−L,P,old) and consequently reduces the P levels in the effluent (from 2.8 to 0.9 g P.m−3). This also has an impact on the sludge line, with hydrogen sulfide production (GH2S) reduced (36%) due to iron sulfide (XFeS) precipitation. As a consequence, there is also a slightly higher energy production (Eproduction) from biogas. Lastly, the inclusion of a stripping and crystallization unit (A3) for P recovery reduces the quantity of P in the anaerobic digester supernatant returning to the water line and allows potential struvite (XMgNH4PO4 ) recovery ranging from 69 to 227−1 depending on: (1) airflow (Qstripping); and, (2) magnesium (QMg(OH)2 ) addition. All the proposed alternatives are evaluated from an environmental and economical point of view using appropriate performance indices. Finally, some deficiencies and opportunities of the proposed approach when performing (plant-wide) wastewater treatment modelling/engineering projects are discussed.


  • K. Solon
  • X Flores-Alsina
  • Christian Kazadi Mbamba
  • D. Ikumi
  • E. I. P Volcke
  • Céline Vaneeckhaute
  • G. Ekama
  • P A Vanrolleghem
  • D. J. Batstone
  • K. V. Gernaey
  • U. Jeppsson
Enheter & grupper
Externa organisationer
  • Technical University of Denmark
  • University of Queensland
  • University of Cape Town
  • Ghent University
  • Laval University

Ämnesklassifikation (UKÄ) – OBLIGATORISK

  • Vattenteknik


Sidor (från-till)97-110
Antal sidor14
TidskriftWater Research
StatusPublished - 2017 apr 15
Peer review utfördJa

Relaterad forskningsoutput

Kimberly Solon, 2017 apr 24, Lund, Sweden: Division of Industrial Electrical Engineering and Automation, Faculty of Engineering, Lund University. 238 s.

Forskningsoutput: AvhandlingDoktorsavhandling (sammanläggning)

Visa alla (1)