Reference study of IFC software support: The GeoBIM benchmark 2019—Part I

Forskningsoutput: TidskriftsbidragArtikel i vetenskaplig tidskrift

Standard

Reference study of IFC software support : The GeoBIM benchmark 2019—Part I. / Noardo, Francesca; Krijnen, Thomas; Arroyo Ohori, Ken; Biljecki, Filip; Ellul, Claire; Harrie, Lars; Eriksson, Helen; Polia, Lorenzo; Salheb, Nebras; Tauscher, Helga; van Liempt, Jordi; Goerne, Hendrik; Hintz, Dean; Kaiser, Tim; Leoni, Cristina; Warchol, Artur; Stoter, Jantien.

I: Transactions in GIS, Vol. 25, Nr. 2, 01.04.2021, s. 805-841.

Forskningsoutput: TidskriftsbidragArtikel i vetenskaplig tidskrift

Harvard

Noardo, F, Krijnen, T, Arroyo Ohori, K, Biljecki, F, Ellul, C, Harrie, L, Eriksson, H, Polia, L, Salheb, N, Tauscher, H, van Liempt, J, Goerne, H, Hintz, D, Kaiser, T, Leoni, C, Warchol, A & Stoter, J 2021, 'Reference study of IFC software support: The GeoBIM benchmark 2019—Part I', Transactions in GIS, vol. 25, nr. 2, s. 805-841. https://doi.org/10.1111/tgis.12709

APA

Noardo, F., Krijnen, T., Arroyo Ohori, K., Biljecki, F., Ellul, C., Harrie, L., Eriksson, H., Polia, L., Salheb, N., Tauscher, H., van Liempt, J., Goerne, H., Hintz, D., Kaiser, T., Leoni, C., Warchol, A., & Stoter, J. (2021). Reference study of IFC software support: The GeoBIM benchmark 2019—Part I. Transactions in GIS, 25(2), 805-841. https://doi.org/10.1111/tgis.12709

CBE

Noardo F, Krijnen T, Arroyo Ohori K, Biljecki F, Ellul C, Harrie L, Eriksson H, Polia L, Salheb N, Tauscher H, van Liempt J, Goerne H, Hintz D, Kaiser T, Leoni C, Warchol A, Stoter J. 2021. Reference study of IFC software support: The GeoBIM benchmark 2019—Part I. Transactions in GIS. 25(2):805-841. https://doi.org/10.1111/tgis.12709

MLA

Vancouver

Noardo F, Krijnen T, Arroyo Ohori K, Biljecki F, Ellul C, Harrie L et al. Reference study of IFC software support: The GeoBIM benchmark 2019—Part I. Transactions in GIS. 2021 apr 1;25(2):805-841. https://doi.org/10.1111/tgis.12709

Author

Noardo, Francesca ; Krijnen, Thomas ; Arroyo Ohori, Ken ; Biljecki, Filip ; Ellul, Claire ; Harrie, Lars ; Eriksson, Helen ; Polia, Lorenzo ; Salheb, Nebras ; Tauscher, Helga ; van Liempt, Jordi ; Goerne, Hendrik ; Hintz, Dean ; Kaiser, Tim ; Leoni, Cristina ; Warchol, Artur ; Stoter, Jantien. / Reference study of IFC software support : The GeoBIM benchmark 2019—Part I. I: Transactions in GIS. 2021 ; Vol. 25, Nr. 2. s. 805-841.

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reference study of IFC software support

T2 - The GeoBIM benchmark 2019—Part I

AU - Noardo, Francesca

AU - Krijnen, Thomas

AU - Arroyo Ohori, Ken

AU - Biljecki, Filip

AU - Ellul, Claire

AU - Harrie, Lars

AU - Eriksson, Helen

AU - Polia, Lorenzo

AU - Salheb, Nebras

AU - Tauscher, Helga

AU - van Liempt, Jordi

AU - Goerne, Hendrik

AU - Hintz, Dean

AU - Kaiser, Tim

AU - Leoni, Cristina

AU - Warchol, Artur

AU - Stoter, Jantien

PY - 2021/4/1

Y1 - 2021/4/1

N2 - Industry Foundation Classes (IFC), the buildingSMART open standard for BIM, is underused with respect to its promising potential, since, according to the experience of practitioners and researchers working with BIM, issues in the standard’s implementation and use prevent its effective use. Nevertheless, a systematic investigation of these issues has never been carried out, and there is thus insufficient evidence for tackling the problems. The GeoBIM benchmark project is aimed at finding such evidence by involving external volunteers, reporting on various aspects of the behavior of tools (geometry, semantics, georeferencing, functionalities), analyzed and described in this article. Interestingly, different IFC software programs with the same standardized data sets yield inconsistent results, with few detectable common patterns, and significant issues are found in their support of the standard, probably due to the very high complexity of the standard data model. A companion article (Part II) describes the results of the benchmark related to CityGML, the counterpart of IFC within geoinformation.

AB - Industry Foundation Classes (IFC), the buildingSMART open standard for BIM, is underused with respect to its promising potential, since, according to the experience of practitioners and researchers working with BIM, issues in the standard’s implementation and use prevent its effective use. Nevertheless, a systematic investigation of these issues has never been carried out, and there is thus insufficient evidence for tackling the problems. The GeoBIM benchmark project is aimed at finding such evidence by involving external volunteers, reporting on various aspects of the behavior of tools (geometry, semantics, georeferencing, functionalities), analyzed and described in this article. Interestingly, different IFC software programs with the same standardized data sets yield inconsistent results, with few detectable common patterns, and significant issues are found in their support of the standard, probably due to the very high complexity of the standard data model. A companion article (Part II) describes the results of the benchmark related to CityGML, the counterpart of IFC within geoinformation.

KW - building information models

KW - GeoBIM

KW - Industry Foundation Classes

KW - interoperability

KW - open standards

KW - software support

U2 - 10.1111/tgis.12709

DO - 10.1111/tgis.12709

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85099104276

VL - 25

SP - 805

EP - 841

JO - Transactions in GIS

JF - Transactions in GIS

SN - 1467-9671

IS - 2

ER -