The proper object of non-doxastic religion: why traditional religion is to be preferred over Schellenberg's simple ultimism

Forskningsoutput: TidskriftsbidragArtikel i vetenskaplig tidskrift

Abstract

Taking for granted the view that belief-less, ‘non-doxastic’, engagement with religion is possible, this article discusses the proper object of such religiosity. Its focus is the claim of J. L. Schellenberg that non-doxastic religion should be directed at ’simple ultimism’. I argue that ‘simple ultimism’ is too abstract to allow for alignment with religious reality. Traditional religion is a better choice since it commonly contains religious experience. As long as the veridicality of such experience remains an epistemic possibility, it should guide our non-doxastic commitment. Objections commonly raised against reliance on religious experience become irrelevant on a non-doxastic approach.

Detaljer

Författare
Enheter & grupper
Forskningsområden

Ämnesklassifikation (UKÄ) – OBLIGATORISK

  • Filosofi
  • Religionsvetenskap
Originalspråkengelska
Antal sidor16
TidskriftReligious Studies: An International Journal for the Philosophy of Religion
Tidigt onlinedatum2018 maj
StatusE-pub ahead of print - 2018 maj
PublikationskategoriForskning
Peer review utfördJa