A comparison of two metacompilation approaches to implementing a complex domain-specific language

David Broman; Peter Fritzson; Görel Hedin; Johan Åkesson

A comparison of two metacompilation approaches to implementing a complex domain-specific language

David Broman, Peter Fritzson, Görel Hedin, Johan Åkesson

Forskningsoutput: Kapitel i bok/rapport/Conference proceeding › Konferenspaper i proceeding › Peer review

Sammanfattning

Abstract in Undetermined
Operational semantics and attribute grammars are examples of formalisms that can be used for generating compilers. We are interested in finding similarities and differences in how these approaches are applied to complex languages, and for generating compilers of such maturity that they have users in industry.
As a specific case, we present a comparative analysis of two compilers for Modelica, a language for physical modeling, and which contains numerous compilation challenges. The two compilers are OpenModelica, which is based on big-step operational semantics, and JModelica.org, which is based on reference attribute grammars.

Originalspråk	engelska
Titel på värdpublikation	Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, SAC 2012
Förlag	Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
ISBN (tryckt)	978-1-4503-0857-1
Status	Published - 2012
Evenemang	2012 Symposium On Applied Computing - Riva del Garda (Trento), Italien Varaktighet: 2012 mars 25 → …

Konferens

Konferens	2012 Symposium On Applied Computing
Land/Territorium	Italien
Ort	Riva del Garda (Trento)
Period	2012/03/25 → …

Bibliografisk information

key=brom_etal2012sac
project=langopt,LCCC-modeling

Ämnesklassifikation (UKÄ)

Datavetenskap (Datalogi)
Reglerteknik

ELLIIT LU P05: Scalable Language Tools for Cyber-Physical Systems
Hedin, G. (PI), Fors, N. (Forskare) & Öqvist, J. (Forskare)
2016/01/01 → 2020/12/31
Projekt: Forskning

Citera det här

@inproceedings{98cd980e1fb840a9a24aa74ed55a9f65,

title = "A comparison of two metacompilation approaches to implementing a complex domain-specific language",

abstract = "Abstract in UndeterminedOperational semantics and attribute grammars are examples of formalisms that can be used for generating compilers. We are interested in finding similarities and differences in how these approaches are applied to complex languages, and for generating compilers of such maturity that they have users in industry.As a specific case, we present a comparative analysis of two compilers for Modelica, a language for physical modeling, and which contains numerous compilation challenges. The two compilers are OpenModelica, which is based on big-step operational semantics, and JModelica.org, which is based on reference attribute grammars.",

author = "David Broman and Peter Fritzson and G{\"o}rel Hedin and Johan {\AA}kesson",

note = "key=brom_etal2012sac project=langopt,LCCC-modeling; 2012 Symposium On Applied Computing ; Conference date: 25-03-2012",

year = "2012",

language = "English",

isbn = "978-1-4503-0857-1",

booktitle = "Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, SAC 2012",

publisher = "Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)",

address = "United States",

}

A comparison of two metacompilation approaches to implementing a complex domain-specific language. / Broman, David; Fritzson, Peter; Hedin, Görel et al.
Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, SAC 2012. Association for Computing Machinery (ACM), 2012.

Forskningsoutput: Kapitel i bok/rapport/Conference proceeding › Konferenspaper i proceeding › Peer review

TY - GEN

T1 - A comparison of two metacompilation approaches to implementing a complex domain-specific language

AU - Broman, David

AU - Fritzson, Peter

AU - Hedin, Görel

AU - Åkesson, Johan

N1 - key=brom_etal2012sac project=langopt,LCCC-modeling

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - Abstract in UndeterminedOperational semantics and attribute grammars are examples of formalisms that can be used for generating compilers. We are interested in finding similarities and differences in how these approaches are applied to complex languages, and for generating compilers of such maturity that they have users in industry.As a specific case, we present a comparative analysis of two compilers for Modelica, a language for physical modeling, and which contains numerous compilation challenges. The two compilers are OpenModelica, which is based on big-step operational semantics, and JModelica.org, which is based on reference attribute grammars.

AB - Abstract in UndeterminedOperational semantics and attribute grammars are examples of formalisms that can be used for generating compilers. We are interested in finding similarities and differences in how these approaches are applied to complex languages, and for generating compilers of such maturity that they have users in industry.As a specific case, we present a comparative analysis of two compilers for Modelica, a language for physical modeling, and which contains numerous compilation challenges. The two compilers are OpenModelica, which is based on big-step operational semantics, and JModelica.org, which is based on reference attribute grammars.

M3 - Paper in conference proceeding

SN - 978-1-4503-0857-1

BT - Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, SAC 2012

PB - Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)

T2 - 2012 Symposium On Applied Computing

Y2 - 25 March 2012

ER -

A comparison of two metacompilation approaches to implementing a complex domain-specific language

Sammanfattning

Konferens

Bibliografisk information

Ämnesklassifikation (UKÄ)

Fingeravtryck

Projekt

ELLIIT LU P05: Scalable Language Tools for Cyber-Physical Systems

Citera det här