TY - JOUR
T1 - A review of invasive and non-invasive sensory feedback in upper limb prostheses
AU - Svensson, Pamela
AU - Wijk, Ulrika
AU - Björkman, Anders
AU - Antfolk, Christian
PY - 2017/6/3
Y1 - 2017/6/3
N2 - Introduction: The constant challenge to restore sensory feedback in prosthetic hands has provided several research solutions, but virtually none has reached clinical fruition. A prosthetic hand with sensory feedback that closely imitates an intact hand and provides a natural feeling may induce the prosthetic hand to be included in the body image and also reinforces the control of the prosthesis. Areas covered: This review presents non-invasive sensory feedback systems such as mechanotactile, vibrotactile, electrotactile and combinational systems which combine the modalities; multi-haptic feedback. Invasive sensory feedback has been tried less, because of the inherent risk, but it has successfully shown to restore some afferent channels. In this review, invasive methods are also discussed, both extraneural and intraneural electrodes, such as cuff electrodes and transverse intrafascicular multichannel electrodes. The focus of the review is on non-invasive methods of providing sensory feedback to upper-limb amputees. Expert commentary: Invoking embodiment has shown to be of importance for the control of prosthesis and acceptance by the prosthetic wearers. It is a challenge to provide conscious feedback to cover the lost sensibility of a hand, not be overwhelming and confusing for the user, and to integrate technology within the constraint of a wearable prosthesis.
AB - Introduction: The constant challenge to restore sensory feedback in prosthetic hands has provided several research solutions, but virtually none has reached clinical fruition. A prosthetic hand with sensory feedback that closely imitates an intact hand and provides a natural feeling may induce the prosthetic hand to be included in the body image and also reinforces the control of the prosthesis. Areas covered: This review presents non-invasive sensory feedback systems such as mechanotactile, vibrotactile, electrotactile and combinational systems which combine the modalities; multi-haptic feedback. Invasive sensory feedback has been tried less, because of the inherent risk, but it has successfully shown to restore some afferent channels. In this review, invasive methods are also discussed, both extraneural and intraneural electrodes, such as cuff electrodes and transverse intrafascicular multichannel electrodes. The focus of the review is on non-invasive methods of providing sensory feedback to upper-limb amputees. Expert commentary: Invoking embodiment has shown to be of importance for the control of prosthesis and acceptance by the prosthetic wearers. It is a challenge to provide conscious feedback to cover the lost sensibility of a hand, not be overwhelming and confusing for the user, and to integrate technology within the constraint of a wearable prosthesis.
KW - closed loop control
KW - non-invasive feedback
KW - peripheral nerve stimulation
KW - sensory feedback
KW - targeted sensory reinnervation
KW - Upper limb prosthetics
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85020087539&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/17434440.2017.1332989
DO - 10.1080/17434440.2017.1332989
M3 - Review article
C2 - 28532184
AN - SCOPUS:85020087539
SN - 1743-4440
VL - 14
SP - 439
EP - 447
JO - Expert Review of Medical Devices
JF - Expert Review of Medical Devices
IS - 6
ER -