Can I be an instantaneous stage and yet persist through time?

Forskningsoutput: TidskriftsbidragArtikel i vetenskaplig tidskriftPeer review

251 Nedladdningar (Pure)

Sammanfattning

An alternative to the standard endurance/perdurance accounts of persistence has recently been developed: the stage theory (Sider, T. Four-Dimensionalism: an Ontology of Persistence and Time. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001; Hawley, K. How Things Persist. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001). According to this theory, a persisting object is identical with an instantaneous stage (temporal part). On the basis of Leibniz’s Law, I argue that stage theorists either have to deny the alleged identity (i.e., give up their central thesis) or hold that stages are both instantaneous and continuants. I subsequently show that, although stage theory is flexible enough to accommodate the latter claim, the cost for accommodating it is an excessive proliferation of persistence concepts.
Originalspråkengelska
Sidor (från-till)235-239
TidskriftMetaphysica
Volym9
Utgåva2
DOI
StatusPublished - 2008

Ämnesklassifikation (UKÄ)

  • Filosofi

Fingeravtryck

Utforska forskningsämnen för ”Can I be an instantaneous stage and yet persist through time?”. Tillsammans bildar de ett unikt fingeravtryck.

Citera det här