Causally Redundant Social Objects: Rejoinder to Elder-Vass

Forskningsoutput: TidskriftsbidragArtikel i vetenskaplig tidskriftPeer review

7 Citeringar (SciVal)
172 Nedladdningar (Pure)


In Elder-Vass’s response to my (2014) it is maintained: (1) that a social object is not identical with but is merely composed of its suitably interrelated parts; (2) that a social object is necessarily indistinguishable in terms of its causal capacities from its interrelated parts; and (3) that ontological individualism lacks an adequate ontological justification (Elder-Vass forthcoming). In this reply, I argue that in view of (1) the so-called redescription principle defended by Elder-Vass ought to be reformulated and renamed; that the conjunction of (1) and (2) renders social objects causally redundant; and that ontological individualism can be coherently formulated and theoretically justified within Elder-Vass’s own metaphysics of objects with causal powers.
Sidor (från-till)798-809
TidskriftPhilosophy of the Social Sciences
StatusPublished - 2014

Ämnesklassifikation (UKÄ)

  • Filosofi


Utforska forskningsämnen för ”Causally Redundant Social Objects: Rejoinder to Elder-Vass”. Tillsammans bildar de ett unikt fingeravtryck.

Citera det här