Clinical impact of medication reviews for community-dwelling patients in primary healthcare

Forskningsoutput: TidskriftsbidragArtikel i vetenskaplig tidskriftPeer review

Sammanfattning

Background: A high number of drug-related problems has previously been shown among community-dwelling patients in primary healthcare in Skåne County, Sweden. Medication reviews are one way to solve these problems, but their impact is largely dependent on the process. We aimed to evaluate medication reviews for community-dwelling patients regarding the clinical relevance of the pharmacists’ recommendations, and their implementation by general practitioners. We also wanted to investigate if the general practitioners’ tendency to act on drug-related problems was correlated to different factors of the process. Methods: This was a cohort study, where patients in primary healthcare considered in need of a medication review were selected. Pharmacists identified drug-related problems and gave written recommendations on how to solve the problems to the general practitioner, via the medical record, and in addition in some cases via verbal communication. The clinical relevance of the recommendations was graded according to the Hatoum scale, ranging from one (adverse significance) to six (extremely significant). Descriptive statistics were used regarding the clinical relevance and the general practitioners´ tendency to act on drug-related problems. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to examine the association between the tendency to act and different factors of the process. Results: A total of 96.1% of the 384 assessed recommendations from the pharmacists were graded as significant or more for the patient (Hatoum grade 3 or higher). The general practitioners acted on 63.8% of the drug-related problems. Fewer recommendations per patient, as well as verbal communication in addition to written contact, significantly increased the general practitioners’ tendency to act on a drug-related problem. No significant association was seen between the tendency to act and the clinical relevance of the recommendation. Conclusions: The high proportion of clinically relevant recommendations from the pharmacists in this study strengthens medication reviews as an important tool for reducing drug-related problems. Verbal communication between the pharmacist and the general practitioner is important for measures to be taken. Multiple recommendations for the same patient reduced their likelihood to of being addressed by the general practitioner.

Originalspråkengelska
Artikelnummer259
TidskriftBMC Primary Care
Volym24
Nummer1
DOI
StatusPublished - 2023 dec.

Bibliografisk information

Publisher Copyright:
© 2023, The Author(s).

Ämnesklassifikation (UKÄ)

  • Samhällsfarmaci och klinisk farmaci

Fingeravtryck

Utforska forskningsämnen för ”Clinical impact of medication reviews for community-dwelling patients in primary healthcare”. Tillsammans bildar de ett unikt fingeravtryck.

Citera det här