TY - JOUR
T1 - Does shale gas development impact property values in Central Appalachia? A mixed methods critical exploration
AU - Caretta, Martina Angela
AU - Emanuel, Ryan E.
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Increased shale gas extraction through hydraulic fracturing and its distribution through shale gas pipelines have brought about innumerable socioeconomic consequences, both tangibly and intangibly. Evidence remains unclear on what are the impacts of shale gas developments on property values. By employing a mixed method approach, combining original data collected in the Marcellus Shale through interviews and a survey, and an analysis of the Atlantic Coast Pipeline, Rover Pipeline and the Mountain Valley Pipeline environmental impact statements, our data shows both an increase and decrease in property value in Central Appalachia. We demonstrate that shale gas pipelines buildout is made possible by skewed environmental impact statements that disregard peer-reviewed science and the experience of those living at the energy frontier. We contend that the inclusion of residents’ lived experience will help to effectively evaluate the social and environmental sustainability of shale gas development. Finally, we argue that additional interdisciplinary original evidence is needed in order to improve environmental impact statements that effectively evaluate the viability and sustainability of energy distribution networks.
AB - Increased shale gas extraction through hydraulic fracturing and its distribution through shale gas pipelines have brought about innumerable socioeconomic consequences, both tangibly and intangibly. Evidence remains unclear on what are the impacts of shale gas developments on property values. By employing a mixed method approach, combining original data collected in the Marcellus Shale through interviews and a survey, and an analysis of the Atlantic Coast Pipeline, Rover Pipeline and the Mountain Valley Pipeline environmental impact statements, our data shows both an increase and decrease in property value in Central Appalachia. We demonstrate that shale gas pipelines buildout is made possible by skewed environmental impact statements that disregard peer-reviewed science and the experience of those living at the energy frontier. We contend that the inclusion of residents’ lived experience will help to effectively evaluate the social and environmental sustainability of shale gas development. Finally, we argue that additional interdisciplinary original evidence is needed in order to improve environmental impact statements that effectively evaluate the viability and sustainability of energy distribution networks.
KW - Shale gas
KW - hydraulic fracturing
KW - pipelines
KW - Property values
KW - Environmental assessment
KW - Qualitative methods
KW - Central Appalachia
KW - Federal energy regulatory commission
KW - Environmental Impact Statements (EIS)
KW - Citation practices
U2 - 10.1016/j.exis.2023.101251
DO - 10.1016/j.exis.2023.101251
M3 - Article
SN - 2214-790X
VL - 14
JO - The Extractive Industries and Society
JF - The Extractive Industries and Society
M1 - 101251
ER -