How not to respond to populism

Anthoula Malkopoulou, Benjamin Moffitt

Forskningsoutput: TidskriftsbidragArtikel i vetenskaplig tidskriftPeer review

Sammanfattning

Although the nature and definition of populism are a source of considerable disagreement, there seems to be a minimal consensus by now that populism poses a number of threats to liberal democracy, and that public authorities should therefore act in defence of the latter. In searching for appropriate responses, however, most scholars draw from strategies for combatting anti-democratic or extremist parties, without considering the important differences between populist parties and these other political actors. We argue that the two central types of democratic defence—the ‘intolerant’ militant democratic defence and the ‘tolerant’ defence—do not offer satisfying responses to populist parties precisely because they were conceived and developed as responses to different phenomena. For public authorities to successfully address populism, responses need to contain its most egregious characteristics, yet salvage its productive side.
Originalspråkengelska
Sidor (från-till)848-865
TidskriftComparative European Politics
Volym21
Nummer6
Tidigt onlinedatum2023 mars 10
DOI
StatusPublished - 2023
Externt publiceradJa

Ämnesklassifikation (UKÄ)

  • Statsvetenskap

Fingeravtryck

Utforska forskningsämnen för ”How not to respond to populism”. Tillsammans bildar de ett unikt fingeravtryck.

Citera det här