TY - BOOK
T1 - Human-Centred AI in the EU
T2 - Trustworthiness as a strategic priority in the European Member States
A2 - Larsson, Stefan
A2 - Ingram Bogusz, Claire
A2 - Andersson Schwarz, Jonas
N1 - Stefan Larsson
Lawyer (LLM), senior lecturer and Associate Professor in Technology and Social Change at at the Department of Technology and Society at Lund University. He holds a PhD in Sociology of Law as well as a PhD in Spatial Planning. His multidisciplinary research focuses on issues of trust and transparency on digital, data-driven markets, and the socio-legal impact of autonomous and AI-driven technologies.
Claire Ingram Bogusz
Post-doctoral researcher at the House of Innovation at the Stockholm School of Economics and the Department of Applied IT at the University of Gothenburg. Prior to comp- leting her PhD, she read law (LLB). Her research interests lie in how code-based technologies change organising, professions, and the dynamics of value creation.
Jonas Andersson Schwarz
Senior lecturer and Associate Professor in Media and Communications at Södertörn University, Stockholm, Sweden. His primary research interest lies in the epistemological and ethical aspects of digital media infrastructure.
PY - 2020/11/30
Y1 - 2020/11/30
N2 - The European approach to artificial intelligence (AI) points to ethical considerations, human control and trustworthiness as its core tenets. But how clearly is this approach reflected in the Member States’ strategies?This anthology analyses to what extent the notions of ethical and trustworthy AI, presented by the High-Level Expert Group on Artificial Intelligence and the European Commission, have influenced AI strategies in Portugal, The Netherlands, Italy, the Czech Republic, Poland, Norway as well as the Nordics overall.It is clear that the EU-level policies have had an impact on the national level strategies, although sometimes only to the extent that they were published before the national documents. For instance, while some countries, such as Norway and Portugal, have explicitly incorporated aspects from the Ethics Guidelines, others, such as the Nordics, already tended to include questions of trust and transparency, or on ethics as in the case of Poland.The EU has emphasised AI trustworthiness as both an ethical imperative and competitive advantage. However, implementation is still at the starting line: much depends on alignment between this diverse group of nations, with different priorities, within the single market.
AB - The European approach to artificial intelligence (AI) points to ethical considerations, human control and trustworthiness as its core tenets. But how clearly is this approach reflected in the Member States’ strategies?This anthology analyses to what extent the notions of ethical and trustworthy AI, presented by the High-Level Expert Group on Artificial Intelligence and the European Commission, have influenced AI strategies in Portugal, The Netherlands, Italy, the Czech Republic, Poland, Norway as well as the Nordics overall.It is clear that the EU-level policies have had an impact on the national level strategies, although sometimes only to the extent that they were published before the national documents. For instance, while some countries, such as Norway and Portugal, have explicitly incorporated aspects from the Ethics Guidelines, others, such as the Nordics, already tended to include questions of trust and transparency, or on ethics as in the case of Poland.The EU has emphasised AI trustworthiness as both an ethical imperative and competitive advantage. However, implementation is still at the starting line: much depends on alignment between this diverse group of nations, with different priorities, within the single market.
KW - AI in the EU
KW - Human-centred AI
KW - Trustworthy AI
KW - EU policy
KW - Member States
KW - AI strategy
KW - Ethics Guidelines
M3 - Anthology (editor)
SN - 978-91-87379-81-9
BT - Human-Centred AI in the EU
PB - European Liberal Forum asbl.
CY - Stockholm
ER -